Arbitration Definition

See All Glossary Terms

Related Glossary Terms

GLOSSARY

/ɑː��ɪˈ�ٰ��ɪʃ(ə)��/

Published by a UU��ֱ�� Dispute Resolution expert

What does Arbitration mean?

Generally, a private form of final and binding dispute resolution by an appointed arbitral tribunal acting in a quasi-judicial manner. Arbitration is, generally, founded on party agreement (the arbitration agreement), and regulated and enforced by national courts.

Unlike other forms of alternative dispute resolution, arbitration is governed by statute: Arbitration Act 1996.

Commercial

Arbitration is a form of alternative dispute resolution in which parties to a dispute submit to the binding decision of a person acting in a judicial manner in private, rather than to a court of law.

Unlike other forms of alternative dispute resolution, arbitration is governed by statute: the Arbitration Act 1996.

Dispute Resolution

Unlike other forms of alternative dispute resolution, arbitration is governed by statute: Arbitration Act 1996.

View the related checklists about Arbitration

MVNO agreement—checklist

MVNO agreement—checklist This Checklist covers some of the main provisions to be included in a mobile virtual network operator (MVNO) agreement under which a mobile network operator supplier will provide wholesale access services to an MVNO for resale to its own retail customers. It covers some of the main provisions that are specific to an agreement of this kind. See also the Precedent: MVNO agreement. In this Checklist, the following definitions are used: • Agreement—means the MVNO agreement between the MVNO and the Supplier for the provision of the Services • End-User—means a customer of the MVNO • IPR—means intellectual property rights • MVNO—means mobile virtual network operator, the customer in the Agreement • Services—means the wholesale network services being provided to the MVNO by the Supplier • Supplier—means the mobile network operator providing network services to the MVNO The third column can be used to record observations or comments as the Checklist is worked through. Checklist Further information Notes (if any) General terms and conditions ☐ Consider duration....

Commercial contract review and execution (business personnel)—checklist

Commercial contract review and execution (business personnel)—checklist This is a Checklist for in-house lawyers to provide to those of its employees (eg procurement or sales professionals) who are engaged in negotiating commercial contracts. It sets out the primary issues to consider when negotiating or reviewing a business-to-business commercial contract, and includes practical guidance. This Checklist may be suitable for use in low risk contracts where employees who are not legally qualified are authorised to conduct negotiations and contract review. It may be customised as required to work with a company playbook on contract negotiation and review, to include suggested fall-back drafting positions and escalation points for recourse to a legal team as appropriate. As it is intended to be used by non-legal professionals, it does not include links to further detailed legal commentary in each case. For a Checklist intended for use by legal professionals with links to further information, see: Commercial contract drafting and review—checklist. In-house lawyers should check that business personnel engaged in negotiating and concluding commercial contracts...

UK design infringement action—flowchart

UK design infringement action—flowchart This Flowchart provides an overview of a UK design infringement action. The specific right relied on could be one of the following design rights which coexist in the UK: • UK registered designs (including re-registered designs) • UK unregistered designs (sometimes referred to as ‘design right’) • supplementary unregistered designs For more information about these rights, see Practice Note: UK registered and unregistered designs. Stage 1—preparing to bring a claim and pre-action matters Claim preparation and pre-action matters—Practice Notes • Infringement of UK registered and unregistered designs • Design disputes—a practical guide • How to run an IP dispute • Copyright in designs • Types of dispute resolution • IP and mediation • IP and arbitration • UK Intellectual Property Office—mediation scheme • Disclosure scheme—when and where it applies Claim preparation and pre-action matters—Precedent • Timetable for disclosure—Business and Property Courts disclosure pilot Claim preparation and pre-action matters—Forms • Application for injunction • Application notice • Notice of hearing of application Stage 2—Letter before action...

Passing off—flowchart

Passing off—flowchart Passing off action Passing off is a common law action that is used to protect unregistered trade mark rights in the UK. The stages of the Flowchart cover establishing a claim for passing off covering: • the three essential elements of goodwill, misrepresentation, and damage • sending a letter of claim, issuing proceedings and applying for an injunction • commencing proceedings in the general Intellectual Property List or the Intellectual Property Enterprise Court sub-list in the Business and Property Court, in the Chancery Division at the High Court • case management including allocation, the case management conference and directions • disclosure and evidence including inspection, additional disclosure and survey evidence • trial preparation and post-trial activities such as election between damages or an account of profits • applications to appeal Stage 1—preparing to bring a claim and pre-action matters Claim preparation and pre-action matters—Practice Notes • Passing off—goodwill, misrepresentation and damage • Trade mark and passing off disputes—a practical guide • How to run an IP dispute...

Arbitration—an introduction to the key features of arbitration

This Practice Note provides an introduction to arbitration and its key features, with a particular focus on arbitration under the law of England and Wales, including the Arbitration Act 1996 (AA 1996).Arbitration is a form of final and binding dispute resolution presided over by an appointed arbitral tribunal (one or three arbitrators, typically) acting in a quasi-judicial manner. Arbitration is, generally speaking, founded on party agreement (the arbitration agreement), and regulated and enforced by national law and national courts. In choosing arbitration, parties opt for a private dispute resolution procedure instead of litigating in court. The result of an arbitration is, usually, an arbitral award, which is a final, binding and enforceable (as against the losing party or parties) decision on the dispute submitted for determination (and akin to a court judgment). Arbitral awards are subject to limited rights of challenge or appeal on either standalone bases or as defences to recognition and enforcement.International commercial arbitration is considered by the international business community to be a true, and often preferable,...

Mediation-arbitration (med-arb)—an introduction

This Practice Note considers the use of mediation-arbitration (med-arb) to resolve commercial disputes.Med-arb is suitable for resolving a wide range of commercial disputes. It is appropriate, for example, for resolving international or cross-border disputes in the construction, energy and infrastructure sectors.What is med-arb?Med-arb is a hybrid, two-stage alternative dispute resolution (ADR) process. It usually involves the parties agreeing to grant a mediator power to convert automatically to being an arbitrator, and to make a legally binding arbitral award, if the mediation fails to result in a settlement of the relevant dispute. The arbitration phase of the process will be legally binding, and the arbitrator’s award will be enforceable like an award rendered in standard arbitration proceedings, which is usually advantageous.There is a range of possible variants to the med-arb process, including having both a mediator and arbitrator present for an opening session. The mediator then conducts a mediation and the arbitrator is only involved again if the mediation fails to reach a settlement. In this variant, the mediation and arbitration...

Discover our 1796 Practice Notes on Arbitration

Ireland—Simple mediation clause

Ireland—Simple mediation clause Nature of the clause This Precedent is a short-form clause for use in a business-to-business (B2B) commercial contract providing for mandatory mediation in the event of a dispute arising out of the agreement. This Precedent clause provides that the parties will seek to settle the dispute. Unlike litigation and arbitration clauses, the purpose of this clause is for the parties to seek to resolve the matter with the assistance of a mediator, but without the need for formal contentious proceedings. What is mediation and why have a mediation clause? Mediation is a form of alternative dispute resolution (ADR) in which a third-party mediator follows a structured process to facilitate an agreed settlement between parties to a dispute. Mediation is a non-binding dispute resolution process, ie any agreement reached in mediation will only be binding on the parties if they enter into a settlement agreement. Mediation allows the parties a high degree of control compared with litigation and provides a collaborative process for dispute resolution. Further advantages of...

Confidentiality and personal data sharing agreement—one-way—pro-recipient

Confidentiality and personal data sharing agreement—one-way—pro-recipient This Agreement is made on [date] Parties 1 [Insert name of party] [of [insert address] OR a company incorporated in [England and Wales] under number [insert registered number] whose registered office is at [insert address]] (the Recipient); and 2 [Insert name of party] [of [insert address] OR a company incorporated in [England and Wales] under number [insert registered number] whose registered office is at [insert address]] (the Discloser), each of the Discloser and the Recipient being a party and together the Discloser and the Recipient are the parties. Background (A) The Recipient carries on the business of [insert details] and the Discloser the business of [insert details]. (B) The Discloser intends to disclose Shared Data to the Recipient for the Purpose. The parties agree: 1 Definitions and interpretation 1.1 In this Agreement: [Authorised Person • means any of the officers, directors, members, partners, employees, consultants, agents, representatives, sub-contractors or professional advisers of the Recipient or...

Dive into our 579 Precedents related to Arbitration

In an arbitration under the London Court of International Arbitration Rules 2014 (LCIA Rules 2014), how does a respondent learn of the date of commencement of the arbitration? Does that date correspond to the date on which the LCIA notifies the respondent of its receipt of the request for arbitration and of the registration fee?

In an arbitration under the London Court of International Arbitration Rules 2014 (LCIA Rules 2014), how does a respondent learn of the date of commencement of the arbitration? Does that date correspond to the date on which the LCIA notifies the respondent of its receipt of the request for arbitration and of the registration fee? The date of commencement of an arbitration under the London Court of International Arbitration Rules 2014 An arbitration in the London Court of International Arbitration (LCIA) is commenced by the claimant delivering the request for arbitration to the LCIA Registrar (the Registrar) (LCIA, Art 1). As this Q&A has identified, the date of commencement of an LCIA arbitration is the date of receipt of the request by the Registrar, subject to the actual receipt of the registration fee as provided by LCIA, Art 1.4. A respondent will learn of the date of the commencement from the LCIA secretariat. As a matter of practice, the LCIA secretariat will notify all parties simultaneously of...

In light of coronavirus (COVID-19), is arbitration preferable over litigation as a method of dispute resolution given the increased flexibility inherent in arbitration proceedings generally?

In light of coronavirus (COVID-19), is arbitration preferable over litigation as a method of dispute resolution given the increased flexibility inherent in arbitration proceedings generally? Clare Ambrose, Twenty Essex This is a ‘once in a generation’ challenge. We will see over the next months how the court system and the arbitration community respond. Arbitration is more flexible, and it is already common for directions to be made electronically, CMCs to be heard by telephone and disputes to be resolved by documents only. It is hoped that arbitration will be agile to meet the needs of parties. If so, and virtual hearings (or even partially virtual hearings) start to work well, then they will become an attractive feature. Corporations weathering this crisis will be mindful of resilience for the next one. Arbitration will be attractive if it is seen to work in times of crisis. If it becomes cheaper and more sustainable too then that must be a bonus. Hamish Lal, Akin Gump The tangible and significant impacts of...

See the 185 Q&As about Arbitration

ICSID publishes 2024 annual report

The International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID) has published its 2024 annual report, providing a look into ICSID's caseload. A total of 341 ICSID cases were administered in the 2024 fiscal year, being the second-highest number of cases handled by ICSID in a single year. Other key highlights include a record 49 nationalities being represented among appointments, 88 cases being concluded and the Republic of Equatorial Guinea becoming the latest state to sign the ICSID Convention, bringing the total to 166 signatory states. The report also highlighted ICSID's extensive outreach and training activities.

Hong Kong Court upholds arbitration agreement and grants anti-suit injunction against Russian Bank (Bank A v Bank B)

Arbitration analysis: In Bank A v Bank B, the Hong Kong Court of First Instance granted an anti-suit injunction and related relief to prevent a Russian bank from pursuing court proceedings in Russia in breach of an arbitration clause contained in the agreement concerned. In so holding, the court rejected the Russian bank’s submission that the case involved acts of state and foreign affairs and that the court had no jurisdiction in the absence of a certificate required by Article 19 of the Basic Law of Hong Kong (‘Certificate’). Further, the court rejected the Russian bank’s argument that the arbitration in Hong Kong would be futile, pointing out that any award made by the arbitral tribunal would be valid and binding on the parties, even if its performance was impossible. Written by Min Li, partner and Patrick Chong, associate at Reed Smith Richards Butler LLP.

Read the latest 8299 News articles on Arbitration

Speed up all aspects of your legal work with tools that help you to work faster and smarter. Win cases, close deals and grow your business–all whilst saving time and reducing risk.

Case studies

"It really is saving us a huge number of hours over the days, weeks and months. Having more relevant support at hand, not having to draft or review documents them from scratch - it all adds up."

Southampton FC

Access all documents on Arbitration

GET ACCESS NOW

Top

Trial

UU��ֱ��

GLOSSARY