"While we began looking at UUÂãÁÄÖ±²¥ products primarily for cost saving, it quickly became more about customer service, ease of onboarding, ongoing training and breadth of resources available."
Co-Op
Access all documents on Duty of care
A duty of care refers to the circumstances and relationships giving rise to an obligation upon a defendant to take proper care to avoid causing some form of foreseeable harm to the claimant in all the circumstances of the case in question.
Once a claimant has established the necessary duty of care owed by the defendant, determined pursuant to various legal tests and depending on the nature of the case, and proven loss or injury that was foreseeable and which stemmed from a failure to take appropriate care in the particular circumstances of the case, the defendant could be liable to pay damages to a party who was injured or who suffered loss as a result of that breach of duty.
Speed up all aspects of your legal work with tools that help you to work faster and smarter. Win cases, close deals and grow your business–all whilst saving time and reducing risk.
For our full legal glossary and more legal research sources, register for a free Lexis+ trial
Perfecting security in real estate finance transactions—checklist This Checklist sets out the steps which property lawyers need to take to perfect security in a real estate finance transaction. Real estate finance lenders will typically want to take a full security package over all of the assets relating to the real estate. A real estate lawyer in a multi-disciplinary team will likely be responsible for arranging or inputting into the following securities and documentation: • security over the land, rental income, insurance proceeds, development and construction and contractual rights • reviewing the management agreement and negotiating a duty of care agreement (although in a multi-disciplinary team, this is sometimes handled by the banking and finance lawyer) • dealing with completion undertakings and post completion registration of the legal charge at Companies House and HM Land Registry as well as giving third party notices regarding rent payment, notice of charge where necessary of assignment of contractual rights or warranties See Practice Notes: Security in real estate finance transactions, Taking security over land...
Negotiating repair obligations in Scottish commercial leases—checklist At common law a landlord, in comparison to a tenant, has quite onerous obligations in so far as the maintenance and repair of a let premises is concerned, see Practice Note: Repair clauses in commercial leases in Scotland—Repair under the common law. In commercial leases, it is almost universal practice for the landlord to seek to divest itself of all common law repairing obligations in relation to the premises let to the tenant (but not the common parts in multi-let buildings, see Practice Note: Service charge and outgoing provisions in commercial leases in Scotland). As such, commercial leases typically impose significant repairing obligations on the tenant. The most common form of commercial lease is a full repairing and insuring (FRI) lease where the tenant is responsible for all repairs of whatever nature with the exception of insured risk damage, see Practice Note: Repair clauses in commercial leases in Scotland—Contracting out of the common law—the full repairing and insuring (FRI) Lease and The modern...
Discover our 18 Checklists on Duty of care
The reasonable person testOnce a court has determined that a common law duty of care exists between the parties, the next stage is for the claimant to prove that the defendant has breached this duty ie the defendant’s conduct has fallen below the standard of care required. Although expert evidence may be obtained this is usually a question of fact. For guidance on whether a duty of care is owed, see Practice Note: Duty of care in personal injury claims.In assessing whether the defendant has breached the duty of care, the court will normally use the reasonable person test ie what would the reasonable person have done, or not done, in the circumstances of this particular incident. For guidance on breach of duty in clinical negligence claims, see Practice Note: Duty of care and breach in clinical negligence claims.When considering the standard of care required of the defendant, the court may consider:•the capacity of the defendant eg age—see below•whether the claimant gave consent—see below•the cost and difficulty of the defendant...
This Practice Note will consider the common law duty of care. For information on statutory duties, see Practice Note: Breach of statutory duty and the overlap with the common law.For breach of duty of care, see Practice Note: Breach of the duty of care in personal injury claims.For guidance on vicarious liability, see Practice Notes: Nature and operation of vicarious liability, Scope and impact of vicarious liability and Vicarious liability in the course of employment—the close connection test.For information on the duty of care in clinical negligence claims, see Practice Note: Duty of care and breach in clinical negligence claims.For a claimant to succeed in proving their claim in common law negligence they must first prove that the defendant owed them a duty of care.Examples of established relationshipsWhen assessing whether a duty of care exists, the court will consider whether there is an established precedent for the relationship between the parties and follow the precedents unless it is necessary to consider whether they should be departed from.Common examples of situations...
Discover our 702 Practice Notes on Duty of care
Witness statement in support of a misfeasance claim under section 212 of the Insolvency Act 1986 Applicant(s): [insert initials and surname] [insert number of witness statement eg 1st] Exhibit: [insert exhibit description] Date: [insert date of witness statement] CASE NO: [insert case number] [ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BUSINESS AND PROPERTY COURTS OF ENGLAND AND WALES INSOLVENCY AND COMPANIES LIST (ChD) OR IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BUSINESS AND PROPERTY COURTS IN [insert location] INSOLVENCY AND COMPANIES LIST (ChD) OR IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE CHANCERY DIVISION [insert location] DISTRICT REGISTRY OR IN THE COUNTY COURT AT [insert location] ] IN THE MATTER OF [insert company’s name] AND IN THE MATTER OF THE INSOLVENCY ACT 1986 BETWEEN [Insert name(s) of the aPPLICANT(s)]        Applicant(s) AND [Insert name(s) of the respondent(s)]        Respondent(s) [INSERT NUMBER] Witness statement of [Insert name OF OFFICE-HOLDER] I, [insert name of the office-holder] of [insert the office-holder's business address] WILL SAY as follows:...
Lease of a rooftop area to an electronic communications operator—new code HM Land Registry Prescribed Clauses [ LR1. Date of the lease [date] LR2. Title Number[s] LR2.1 Landlord’s title number [s] [title number(s) out of which this lease is granted. Leave blank if not registered] LR2.2 Other title numbers [existing title number(s) against which entries of matters referred to in LR9, LR10, LR11 and LR13 are to be made] LR3. Parties to this lease Landlord [[OPTION 1 — name of Landlord (not an overseas entity)] [of OR incorporated in England and Wales (company registration number [number]) whose registered office is at] [address]OR[OPTION 2 — name of Landlord (overseas entity)] [incorporated OR formed] in [territory of incorporation/formation] (registration number [number]) [and registered at Companies House (company registration number BR[number])] (overseas entity ID [[number] OR not required]) whose registered office is at [address]] Tenant [[OPTION 1 — name of Tenant (not an overseas entity)] [of OR incorporated in...
Dive into our 78 Precedents related to Duty of care
Who is responsible for an occupier's liability claim when the accident occurred in premises subject to a lease? The tenant company had ceased trading before the accident and a new tenant company had not entered into a new lease agreement with the landlord. This Q&A considers who may qualify as an occupier under the Occupiers’ Liability Act 1957 (OLA 1957). OLA 1957 contains no definition of an ‘occupier’. The issue of who is an occupier is dealt with under the common law. It is important to recognise that the key issue is of control over, rather than ownership of, the premises. An occupier is any legal entity with a sufficient degree of control over premises such that it can properly be considered to be an occupier (see Wheat v E Lacon). The key element is that the occupier has effective control. There is no requirement for the occupier to have a legal interest in the land. There can be multiple occupiers of premises at any given time. It has...
If a claimant receives negligent home care, is this considered clinical negligence? Duty of care Duties to patients in contract: Butterworths Personal Injury Litigation Service [211] states: ‘Where a health professional undertakes private practice, a contractual relationship is likely to arise between the patient and the health professional. In the absence of an express term to the contrary, a term will be implied into that contract that the service will be performed with reasonable care and skill. In the case of private hospital treatment, most doctors undertake such services as independent contractors. Thus, for example, there may be separate contractual relationships in respect of the provision of nursing care, resident medical officers and laboratory services.’ Duties to patients in tort: Butterworths Personal Injury Litigation Service [215]: states: ‘A duty to exercise reasonable care and skill is imposed on a health professional who undertakes the tasks of diagnosis, advice or treatment. The duty exists independent of any contractual duty that may exist. The duty arises once the patient is accepted for...
See the 211 Q&As about Duty of care
This week's edition of Public Law Weekly highlights include the Cabinet Office's final preparations for the Procurement Act 2023, which comes fully into force on 24 February 2025, and the Prime Minister’s announcement of reforms to the judicial review process for nationally significant infrastructure projects. Additionally, this edition features the Tickle case in which Court of Appeal set aside the order that anonymised the judges in historic family proceedings relating to Sara Sharif, as well as the Department for Business and Trade’s (DBT) publication of its Assimilated Law Parliamentary Report for June to December 2024. The highlights also include enhanced coverage of the Supreme Court judgment in The Father v Worcestershire CC and expert analysis of the Court of Appeal's decision in Chief Constable of Northamptonshire Police v Woodcock and HD v Chief Constable of Wiltshire Police, a conjoined appeal examining whether the police can have a duty to investigate pursuant to the article 3 Convention right before the claimant has suffered ill-treatment, plus selected Brexit statutory instruments (SIs) and...
This week's edition of PI & Clinical Negligence weekly highlights includes a news analysis of how advances in neurotechnology may impact the personal injury and clinical negligence industry, a case in which QOCS protection was reinstated by the Court of Appeal in a ‘mixed’ claim and a case analysis where the Court of Appeal again considered whether the police held a duty of care to protect the public from third party harm, following on from the Supreme Court decision in Tindall. We also bring you details of the updated guidance published by HMCTS for the Damages Claims pilot scheme under CPR PD 51ZB. In addition, we have our usual roundup of other news, cases and New Law Journal articles of interest.
Read the latest 1546 News articles on Duty of care
**Trials are provided to all UUÂãÁÄÖ±²¥ content, excluding Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance, subscription packages are tailored to your specific needs. To discuss trialling these UUÂãÁÄÖ±²¥ services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK, Ireland and selected UK overseas territories and Caribbean countries. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.
0330 161 1234