Indictment Definition

GLOSSARY

Published by a UU��ֱ�� Corporate Crime expert

What does Indictment mean?

The indictment consists of the charge or charges preferred against the defendant by the prosecution once the case is begun.

Indictment is defined by the Indictments Act 1915, s 3 as 'a statement of the specific offence or offences with which the accused person is charged, together with such particulars as may be necessary for giving reasonable information as to the nature of the charge'. Ultimate responsibility for the drafting of the indictment, the charges therein and whether they are appropriate rests with the counsel for the prosecution (Newland [1988] QB 402, per Watkins LJ at p. 409). It must be served on an officer of the Court within 28 days of the accused is committed (or transferred) for trial. Once served, the power to cure any defects lies with the Indictments Act 1915, s 5(1) where the indictment appears defective, making such changes as are necessary to meet the circumstances of the case, unless, having regard to the merits of the case, the required amendments cannot be made without injustice.

Corporate Crime

The indictment consists of the charge or

View the related checklists about Indictment

Advising a client, trial on indictment or summary trial?—checklist

Advising a client, trial on indictment or summary trial?—checklist Advantages of Summary Trial • Less expensive • Less time consuming • Possible lower sentence • Less formality: advocates do not wear wigs or gowns • Automatic right of appeal if defendant convicted Disadvantage of Summary Trial • Magistrates may be case hardened, more likely to convict • No division between tribunal of fact/law, making it difficult to forget inadmissible evidence • The court has the power to commit for sentence if it thinks it has inadequate powers of punishment for an either way

Application to stay on the grounds of delay—checklist

Application to stay on the grounds of delay—checklist Test for delay The granting of a stay is an exceptional remedy, or, a remedy of last resort. Proceedings can only be stayed if the court is satisfied on the balance of probabilities that, by reason of delay, a fair trial would not be possible. There are two bases on which a stay in this kind of context may be granted: • the defendant can no longer have a fair trial, or • it is not fair for the defendant to be tried at all Considerations for determining whether the delay would deprive the defendant of a fair trial include: • the length of delay • the prosecution's reasons to justify the delay • the defendant’s efforts to assert his rights, and • the prejudice caused to the defendant The court may stay proceedings on some counts of the indictment for abuse of process but only if satisfied, on the balance of probabilities that, by reason of delay, a...

The indictment

The rules relating to the form of indictments and the procedure for their creation and adoption are contained in the following: •the Indictments Act 1915 (IA 1915)•section 2 of the Administration of Justice (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1933 (AJ(MP)A 1933), and•Parts 3, 10 and 25 of the Criminal Procedure Rules 2020 (CrimPR 2020), SI 2020/759For information on what an indictment must contain, its form, dealing with defects and amending indictments, see Practice Note: The indictment—content, form, defects and amendments.What is an indictment?An indictment is the formal document containing the list of charges against a defendant which is preferred (formally served) in the Crown Court. This is a different document to the written charge or information produced by the prosecution in order to commence the prosecution in the magistrates' court. See Practice Notes: Commencing criminal proceedings—applying for the issue of a summons and Commencing criminal proceedings—written charge and requisition or single justice procedure notice.The indictment is traditionally drafted by the prosecutor, eg the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) or other prosecuting authority. In...

Voluntary bill of indictment

Voluntary bill of indictmentAn indictment may, exceptionally, be preferred (ie served on a Crown Court) by the direction or with the consent of a High Court judge under the Administration of Justice (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1933 (AJ(MP)A 1933). This is also known as a 'voluntary bill'. These are rare because a voluntary bill can only be preferred in certain limited circumstances:•if the bill is preferred by the direction of the Court of Criminal Appeal or by the direction or with the consent of a judge of the High Court•with the consent of a judge of the Crown Court following a declaration by the court under paragraph 8(1) of Schedule 17 to the Crime and Courts Act 2013 (CCA 2013) (court approval of deferred prosecution agreement) •if the charge, or any of the charges, against the applicant is dismissed and ◦no further proceedings may be brought on the dismissed charge or charges, except by means of the preferment of a voluntary bill, and◦unless the applicant is in custody otherwise than on...

Discover our 530 Practice Notes on Indictment

Memorandum on directors’ responsibilities, obligations and potential liabilities in respect of a prospectus—Main Market

Memorandum on directors’ responsibilities, obligations and potential liabilities in respect of a prospectus—Main Market 1 Introduction 1.1 This memorandum has been prepared for those persons who are to be named in the prospectus to be published by [insert name of company] (the Company) as directors or proposed directors of the Company (the Directors) in connection with the application for admission to listing of the ordinary shares of the Company on the Official List of the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) and to trading on the Main Market of the London Stock Exchange plc (LSE) (the Admission). 1.2 A prospectus is required to be published by the Company in connection with the application for Admission. The prospectus must be submitted to and approved by the FCA before it is published. The Directors (among others) are responsible for the contents of the prospectus and a statement that each Director takes responsibility must be included in the prospectus. 1.3 This memorandum summarises the responsibilities, obligations and potential liabilities faced by the...

Memorandum to board/senior management accompanying financial sanctions policy

Memorandum to board/senior management accompanying financial sanctions policy Financial sanctions are measures which restrict dealings in money and the provision of financial services—they can include the prohibition of funds transfers to certain countries, individuals or entities. The Sanctions and Anti-Money Laundering Act 2018 (SAMLA 2018) is the UK’s primary sanctions legislation, which defines the types of sanctions that may be imposed and the purposes for which they may be imposed. It empowers ministers to make various regulations about them, and imposes duties to ensure proper scrutiny and protection of the rights of those affected by them. Specific sanctions regulations made under SAMLA 2018 can provide for a variety of different types of sanctions measures, including financial, trade, immigration, transport, etc. Financial sanctions usually cover prohibitions on dealing with assets, or making funds or economic resources available to or for the benefit of designated persons. There can also be sectoral sanctions which prohibit and restrict specified financial and investment activities. For our business it is essential that we comply...

Dive into our 4 Precedents related to Indictment

In a criminal appeal to the Crown Court, CrimPR 34.2(5) proves that 'unless the respondent agrees that the Court should allow the appeal' a respondent's notice must be filed. What are the consequences of failure to do so? Would the appeal be allowed by default? Is the respondent permitted to file and serve a respondent's notice after this time?

In a criminal appeal to the Crown Court, CrimPR 34.2(5) proves that 'unless the respondent agrees that the Court should allow the appeal' a respondent's notice must be filed. What are the consequences of failure to do so? Would the appeal be allowed by default? Is the respondent permitted to file and serve a respondent's notice after this time? Criminal Procedure Rule (CrimPR), SI 2020/759, r 34.2 is entitled ‘Service of appeal and respondent’s notices’. CrimPR, SI 2020/759, r 34.2(5) provides as follows: 'Where the appeal is against conviction or against a finding of guilt, unless the respondent agrees that the court should allow the appeal— (a) the respondent must serve a respondent's notice on— (i) the Crown Court officer; and (ii) the appellant; and (b) the respondent must serve that notice not more than 15 business days after service of the appeal notice.' The clear inference is accordingly that, where the respondent intends to contest an appeal to the Crown Court, they are required to file a Respondent’s Notice...

What civil or criminal personal liability could a nominated officer (also referred to as the Money Laundering Reporting Officer, or MLRO) or Money Laundering Compliance Officer (MLCO) potentially incur in the role and what is the source of this liability?

What civil or criminal personal liability could a nominated officer (also referred to as the Money Laundering Reporting Officer, or MLRO) or Money Laundering Compliance Officer (MLCO) potentially incur in the role and what is the source of this liability? Nominated officer The nominated officer (also referred to as the Money Laundering Reporting Officer, or MLRO) is the person nominated to receive and consider suspicious activity reports (SARs) under the Terrorism Act 2000 (TA 2000) and the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (POCA 2002). They are also expected to make external SARs to the National Crime Agency (NCA). Not all organisations have to appoint a nominated officer. You must appoint a nominated officer if the Money Laundering, Terrorist Financing and Transfer of Funds (Information on the Payer) Regulations 2017 (MLR 2017), SI 2017/692 apply to your business, ie you are: • a relevant person • acting in the course of business in the UK • not subject to one of the very narrowly drawn exclusions in MLR 2017, SI 2017/692,...

See the 39 Q&As about Indictment

Reckitt investors to test class-action rules in opioid case

Law360: The Court of Appeal will consider on 10 December 2024 whether shareholders in Reckitt Benckiser and drug company Indivior can pursue litigation linked to America's opioid crisis as a 'representative claim' that is similar to a US-style class action.

All eyes on the SFO after LC&F Ponzi scheme ruling

Law360, London: Damning findings in civil litigation that the directors of London Capital & Finance (LC&F) ran the bonds company as a Ponzi scheme could foreshadow the Serious Fraud Office's (SFO) parallel criminal investigation into the failed £237m investment business, lawyers say.

Read the latest 316 News articles on Indictment

Speed up all aspects of your legal work with tools that help you to work faster and smarter. Win cases, close deals and grow your business–all whilst saving time and reducing risk.

Case studies

"The way UU��ֱ�� dealt with us was receptive and not pushy. They took the time to get to know us and what we needed as a business."

Irwin Mitchell

Access all documents on Indictment

GET ACCESS NOW

Top

Trial

UU��ֱ��

GLOSSARY