Investors Definition

GLOSSARY

Published by a UU��ֱ�� Corporate expert

What does Investors mean?

The investors in a equity'>private equity fund, who will be mainly institutional investors. Typical investors will include pension funds, sovereign wealth funds, funds of funds and university endowments although high net worth individuals and family offices may also invest. The investors will be the limited partners in a limited partnership fund.

View the related checklists about Investors

General meetings (including AGMs)—members’ rights—checklist

General meetings (including AGMs)—members’ rights—checklist The following table summarises and compares the relevant provisions of the Companies Act 2006 (CA 2006) in relation to the rights of members in relation to general meetings (GMs) (including annual general meetings (AGMs)). For more comprehensive information on the provisions see Practice Note: General meetings (including AGMs)—members’ rights. Member right Which company? Type of meeting Voting threshold Limits to provision Action to be taken by company Costs and expenses Requisition a GM and include proposed text of a resolution to be moved (CA 2006, s 303) All companies GM At least 5% of paid-up capital carrying right to vote at meeting. Request must state general nature of business to be dealt with and may include text of a resolution that may properly be moved. Request may be in hard copy or electronic form and must be authenticated. Resolution may not be moved if ineffective, defamatory, frivolous or vexatious. Directors to call GM within 21 days.Meeting to be held no more than 28 days...

Bank Recovery and Resolution Directive (BRRD)—timeline [Archived]

Bank Recovery and Resolution Directive (BRRD)—timeline [Archived] Archived:This timeline has been archived. For developments from January 2024 onwards, see EU Bank Recovery and Resolution Directive—timeline if they relate to the EU BRRD, or UK bank recovery and resolution regime—timeline if they relate to the UK bank recovery and resolution regime, For further guidance on the EU BRRD, see Practice Note: Bank Recovery and Resolution Directive (BRRD)—essentials. For further guidance on the UK bank recovery and resolution regime, see Practice Note: The UK bank recovery and resolution regime. Date Source Document Description 20 December 2023 European Banking Authority The EBA publishes amendments to disclosures and reporting on MREL and TLAC The European Banking Authority (EBA) has published its final draft implementing technical standards (ITS) on amendments to disclosure and reporting of the minimum requirement for own funds and eligible liabilities (MREL) and the total loss absorbency requirement (TLAC). The amendments reflect the new requirement to deduct investments in eligible liabilities instruments of entities belonging to the same resolution group, the...

Tier 1 (Investor): key practical considerations [Archived]

Tier 1 (Investor): key practical considerations [Archived] ARCHIVED: The Tier 1 (Investor) category was closed to initial applications, without warning, from 16:00 on 17 February 2022 through Statement of Changes in Immigration Rules CP 632. Those with existing leave in the route are still be able to extend their stay, including making an application for entry clearance outside the UK if they have held leave as a Tier 1 (Investor) migrant in the 12-month period preceding the date of application, and apply for settlement. Extension applications made inside or outside the UK must be submitted by 17 February 2026. Applications for settlement must be made before 17 February 2028. For further information, see: LNB News 17/02/2022 76. This Practice Note, which was last updated prior to the introduction of post-Brexit work and study routes in December 2020, further to Statement of Changes in Immigration rules HC 617, has been retained in archived form for historical interest. Anti-money laundering requirements and other client due diligence procedures Matters...

Statement of Changes in Immigration Rules, HC 309—analysis [Archived]

Statement of Changes in Immigration Rules, HC 309—analysis [Archived] This analysis considers the main changes to the Immigration Rules (the Rules) set out in HC 309. HC 309 was issued on 7 December 2017, along with an Explanatory Memorandum (EM). It covers: • the electronic issuing of entry clearance • controversial changes to the Rules relating to indefinite leave to remain (ILR) for main applicants and their dependants in work categories, in particular on how absences from the UK are to be treated • substantial amendments to the Tier 1 (Entrepreneur) sub-tier • amendments to Tier 1 (Exceptional Talent) including: ◦ increasing the Tier 1 (Exceptional Talent) limit to 2000 endorsements per year, with 1,000 of these to be allocated among the Designated Competent Bodies on a first-come first-served basis ◦ introducing provision for migrants endorsed under the exceptional talent criteria to apply for ILR after three years • amendments to Tier 2 (General), including: ◦ allowing Tier 4 (General) students to apply to switch into Tier...

Discover our 2009 Practice Notes on Investors

Outline timetable for an AIM admission

Outline timetable for an AIM admission This precedent timetable shows the main steps involved in an AIM IPO (where a UK company is applying for the initial admission of its shares to trading on AIM) and no prospectus is required. Impact Day – 12 weeks Event Responsibility All parties meeting All Circulate timetable Nomad Circulate draft list of documents and list of parties Nomad Circulate draft engagement letters Nomad Circulate financial due diligence questionnaire and legal due diligence questionnaire Reporting accountants and Company solicitors Impact Day — 11 weeks Event Responsibility Circulate memorandum on directors’ responsibilities and potential liabilities in respect of an AIM admission document Company solicitors Circulate memorandum on the responsibilities and continuing obligations of a director of an AIM company Company solicitors Circulate directors’ questionnaires, directors’ powers of attorney and directors’ responsibility letters Company solicitors/Nomad Return response to financial due diligence questionnaire and legal due diligence questionnaire Company Commence financial due diligence (including financial procedures review) Reporting accountants Commence legal due diligence Company...

Memorandum on the responsibilities and obligations of a director of an AIM company

Memorandum on the responsibilities and obligations of a director of an AIM company 1 Introduction 1.1 This memorandum has been prepared for the directors and proposed directors (the Directors) of the Company to provide a general introduction to the principal responsibilities and obligations of a director of a company whose shares are admitted, or will be admitted, to AIM, a market operated by London Stock Exchange plc (LSE). 1.2 Once a company’s securities are admitted to trading on AIM, a company and its directors are subject to an increased layer of regulation. This includes requirements set out in the AIM Rules for Companies published by the LSE (AIM Rules), the Disclosure Guidance and Transparency Rules sourcebook (DTRs), the Prospectus Rules and the Market Abuse Regulation. 1.3 As a Director, you will be responsible (individually and collectively with your fellow Directors) for the Company's compliance with these provisions. The LSE has the power to fine or publicly censure an AIM company in the case of a...

Dive into our 111 Precedents related to Investors

How does a company remove a charge from the charges register at Companies House that has already been released if the beneficiary of the charge is a dissolved company or has been taken over by another company?

How does a company remove a charge from the charges register at Companies House that has already been released if the beneficiary of the charge is a dissolved company or has been taken over by another company? There is no statutory requirement for a chargor to notify Companies House that it has either fully or partially satisfied a debt or had its security released. However, such notification will be in the best interests of the chargor so that any potential investors and lenders are aware that the debt has been satisfied and/or its assets are unencumbered. Where a charge has been released in full, to notify Companies House, the chargor should submit form MR04 (Statement of satisfaction in

Instead of rectification, can the Chartbrook principle (Chartbrook v Persimmon) be used to correct a drafting error in a contract that was intended to have a clause providing for auto-renewal at the end of the contract, but which contains a drafting error which renders the auto-renewal clause nonsensical?

Instead of rectification, can the Chartbrook principle (Chartbrook v Persimmon) be used to correct a drafting error in a contract that was intended to have a clause providing for auto-renewal at the end of the contract, but which contains a drafting error which renders the auto-renewal clause nonsensical? Rectification is an equitable remedy aimed at amending a document to accord with the intention of the parties. Parties to a contract may have had a common intention or understanding when they drew up their contract as to what it meant but, somehow, that meaning has not been reflected in the drafting, ie it is different from the objective meaning of the contractual document as ascertained in accordance with the rules of contract interpretation. Alternatively, a mistake may be able to be corrected by means of construction ie, seeking a declaration of the court as to the meaning of the relevant clause, rather than by applying for rectification. In Investors Compensation Scheme v West Bromwich Building Society, Lord Hoffmann set out...

See the 163 Q&As about Investors

High Court confirms broad government discretion in UK national security reviews

Competition analysis: In this judgment, the High Court issued its first ever ruling on a challenge to an unwinding order imposed by the UK government under the National Security and Investment Act 2021 (NSIA 2021). In a clear victory for the government, the court confirmed the broad discretion of the Secretary of State to determine the appropriate remedy for resolving national security concerns arising from a problematic transaction, up to and including forced divestment of the acquirer’s shareholding in a qualifying entity, as well confirming that the overall process followed by the Government in such cases is fair and proportionate. The judgment is also notable for the insights that it provides into the process followed by Government officials and ministers for in-depth reviews under the NSIA 2021, with the level of detail going well beyond what has been disclosed in the Government’s own guidance to date. Written by Becket McGrath, partner at Euclid Law Ltd.

Financial Services weekly highlights—19 December 2024

This week's edition of Financial Services weekly highlights includes: FCA publishes five portfolio strategy letters; ESAs publish report on 2024 dry run exercise for DORA reporting; Cross-border payments: FSB issues recommendations on frictions in data flows and consistency in regulation between bank and non-bank PSPs; plus dates for your diary over the coming week.

Read the latest 7202 News articles on Investors

Speed up all aspects of your legal work with tools that help you to work faster and smarter. Win cases, close deals and grow your business–all whilst saving time and reducing risk.

Case studies

"The forms and precedents section is essential so that I can quickly and easily look up provisions to include in templates or bespoke project contracts."

RWE

Access all documents on Investors

GET ACCESS NOW

Top

Trial

UU��ֱ��

GLOSSARY