Negligence Definition

GLOSSARY

Published by a UU��ֱ�� Commercial expert

What does Negligence mean?

Negligence is 'the omission to do something which a reasonable man, guided upon those considerations which ordinarily regulate human affairs, would do, or doing something which a prudent and reasonable man would not do' (Blythe v Birmingham Waterworks (1856) 11 Exch 781, at p 784). It is accepted that the test for breach of duty is objective, in the sense that the individual character and mental and physical features of the particular defendant are usually irrelevant.

Negligence does not always consist of a positive act. It may also occur in the omission to take some action or other as a result of which the claimant suffers damage. This is sometimes termed 'nonfeasance', as opposed to 'misfeasance' which is the term used to describe an act of negligence.

View the related checklists about Negligence

Commercial contract review and execution (business personnel)—checklist

Commercial contract review and execution (business personnel)—checklist This is a Checklist for in-house lawyers to provide to those of its employees (eg procurement or sales professionals) who are engaged in negotiating commercial contracts. It sets out the primary issues to consider when negotiating or reviewing a business-to-business commercial contract, and includes practical guidance. This Checklist may be suitable for use in low risk contracts where employees who are not legally qualified are authorised to conduct negotiations and contract review. It may be customised as required to work with a company playbook on contract negotiation and review, to include suggested fall-back drafting positions and escalation points for recourse to a legal team as appropriate. As it is intended to be used by non-legal professionals, it does not include links to further detailed legal commentary in each case. For a Checklist intended for use by legal professionals with links to further information, see: Commercial contract drafting and review—checklist. In-house lawyers should check that business personnel engaged in negotiating and concluding commercial contracts...

Checklist—The Diffuse Mesothelioma Payments Scheme

Checklist—The Diffuse Mesothelioma Payments Scheme This Checklist outlines the key aspects of the Diffuse Mesothelioma Payments Scheme which was set up in July 2014 to make payments to victims of mesothelioma who are unable to trace either a liable insurer or their employers’ liable insurer. The key aspects of the Diffuse Mesothelioma Payments Scheme are: Provision The law The detail Comment Eligible applicants Section 2 of the Mesothelioma Act 2014 (MA 2014) A claimant is eligible for payment if 'a relevant employer has negligently or in breach of statutory duty caused or permitted the person to be exposed to asbestos'The claimant must not have already brought a claim for damages against an insurer or employerThey must be 'unable to bring an action' because the employer or insurer 'cannot be found or no longer exists or for any other reason'The claimant must not have received damages or 'a specified payment' or be entitled to received such a payment in respect of their mesothelioma This eligibility criteria can be problematic for...

The Pre-Action Protocol for the Resolution of Clinical Disputes—pre-6 April 2015 [Archived]

The Pre-Action Protocol for the Resolution of Clinical Disputes—pre-6 April 2015 [Archived] ARCHIVED: This Practice Note has been archived and is not maintained. Note: A new version of the protocol applies from 6 April 2015. For the post-6 April 2015 pre-action protocol, see Practice Note: The Pre-Action Protocol for the Resolution of Clinical Disputes—6 April 2015 onwards. The Clinical Disputes Protocol came into force on 26 April 1999. It arose from the Clinical Disputes Forum, a multi-disciplinary body formed in 1997 as a result of Lord Woolf’s Access to Justice inquiry. It is designed to encourage a climate of openness when something has gone wrong with a patient’s treatment or the patient is dissatisfied with medical treatment. It sets out a timed sequence of steps for patients and health care providers to follow when a dispute arises. It is designed to speed up the exchange of relevant information and increase the prospects of dispute resolution without resorting to legal action. The Clinical Disputes Protocol created a...

Quantum database general damages uplifts—flowchart

Quantum database general damages uplifts—flowchart This flowchart explains the figures in the General Damages (PSLA) Today’s Value field. As well as inflation, this field takes into account the Heil v Rankin ([2000] 3 All ER 138) uplift and/or the Simmons v Castle ([2012] EWCA Civ 1288) uplift, where they are relevant. This ensures that the General Damages (PSLA) Today’s Value field provides practitioners with an accurately updated general damages figure. Note: The Simmons v Castle uplift has not been added

Discover our 1622 Practice Notes on Negligence

Licence to carry out environmental investigations

Licence to carry out environmental investigations Parties 1 [insert name of licensor] [of [insert address] OR company number [insert company number] whose registered office is at [insert address]] (the Licensor) 2 [insert name of licensee] [of [insert address] OR company number [insert company number] whose registered office is at [insert address]] (the Licensee) 1 Background (A) The Licensor is the registered [freehold OR leasehold] owner of the Property. (B) The Licensee has expressed an interest in [acquiring OR leasing] the Property. (C) The Licensor will permit access to the Property by the Licensee and the Consultant for the purpose of carrying out investigations as to ground conditions at, in, on, under or about the Property, subject to the terms of this Licence. 2 Definitions Competent Authority • means any statutory undertaker or any public local or other authority or regulatory body or government department, or any other body exercising powers under statute or by royal charter or any court of law or any...

Part 26A restructuring plan for SMEs

Part 26A restructuring plan for SMEs IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BUSINESS AND PROPERTY COURTS OF ENGLAND AND WALES COMPANIES LIST (CHD) IN THE MATTER OF [insert name of the Company] AND IN THE MATTER OF THE COMPANIES ACT 2006 BETWEEN [insert name of the Company] and THE PLAN CREDITORS [AND MEMBERS] (as defined herein) RESTRUCTURING PLAN (under Part 26A of the Companies Act 2006) DATED [insert date] RECITALS The Company (A) [Insert name of the Company] is a [private] limited company, incorporated in [England and Wales] with company number [insert company number] and office at [insert address] (the Company) Purpose of the Restructuring Plan (B) The purpose of this Restructuring Plan is to affect a compromise and arrangement between: [(i)] the Company and the Plan Creditors; [and (ii) the Company and the Members], in order to eliminate, reduce or prevent, or mitigate the effect of financial difficulties encountered [or likely to be encountered] by the Company that are affecting, or will...

Dive into our 596 Precedents related to Negligence

Who is responsible for an occupier's liability claim when the accident occurred in premises subject to a lease? The tenant company had ceased trading before the accident and a new tenant company had not entered into a new lease agreement with the landlord.

Who is responsible for an occupier's liability claim when the accident occurred in premises subject to a lease? The tenant company had ceased trading before the accident and a new tenant company had not entered into a new lease agreement with the landlord. This Q&A considers who may qualify as an occupier under the Occupiers’ Liability Act 1957 (OLA 1957). OLA 1957 contains no definition of an ‘occupier’. The issue of who is an occupier is dealt with under the common law. It is important to recognise that the key issue is of control over, rather than ownership of, the premises. An occupier is any legal entity with a sufficient degree of control over premises such that it can properly be considered to be an occupier (see Wheat v E Lacon). The key element is that the occupier has effective control. There is no requirement for the occupier to have a legal interest in the land. There can be multiple occupiers of premises at any given time. It has...

If a claimant receives negligent home care, is this considered clinical negligence?

If a claimant receives negligent home care, is this considered clinical negligence? Duty of care Duties to patients in contract: Butterworths Personal Injury Litigation Service [211] states: ‘Where a health professional undertakes private practice, a contractual relationship is likely to arise between the patient and the health professional. In the absence of an express term to the contrary, a term will be implied into that contract that the service will be performed with reasonable care and skill. In the case of private hospital treatment, most doctors undertake such services as independent contractors. Thus, for example, there may be separate contractual relationships in respect of the provision of nursing care, resident medical officers and laboratory services.’ Duties to patients in tort: Butterworths Personal Injury Litigation Service [215]: states: ‘A duty to exercise reasonable care and skill is imposed on a health professional who undertakes the tasks of diagnosis, advice or treatment. The duty exists independent of any contractual duty that may exist. The duty arises once the patient is accepted for...

See the 623 Q&As about Negligence

No reliance on advice meant that claim for damages for negligence failed (Darcliffe Homes v Glanville Consultants)

Construction analysis: The Technology and Construction Court (TCC) dismissed a claim for damages for professional negligence by a property developer against a consultant engineer after finding that the engineer had failed to act with reasonable skill and care, because the property developer had not relied on the advice given and would not have done anything differently had non-negligent advice been given. The court held that the property developer had failed to establish a sufficient nexus between a particular element of the harm for which it sought damages and the subject matter of the engineering company’s duty of care.

Court Funds Office confirms reduction in interest rates for special and basic accounts

The Court Funds Office has confirmed there was a further reduction in interest rates for its accounts, effective from 6 December 2024. The Special Account rate has been lowered from 5.00% to 4.75%, whilst the Basic Account rate has been reduced from 3.75% to 3.56%.

Read the latest 4342 News articles on Negligence

Speed up all aspects of your legal work with tools that help you to work faster and smarter. Win cases, close deals and grow your business–all whilst saving time and reducing risk.

Case studies

"A lot of the work that I do is historic-the maximum sentences change at different points of time. It's really complicated and people get it wrong all the time. That's when having a timeline is really useful."

1 High Pavement

Access all documents on Negligence

GET ACCESS NOW

Top

Trial

UU��ֱ��

GLOSSARY