Res judicata Definition

GLOSSARY

Published by a UU��ֱ�� Dispute Resolution expert

What does Res judicata mean?

Latin for the matter has been decided. At common law, once a court has made a decision, the matter cannot be re-opened once the time limit for appealing or the relevant limitation period has expired.

A res judicata is a decision by a judge or tribunal which disposes, with finality, of a matter decided so that it cannot be re-litigated by those bound by the judgment, except on appeal. There are ome statutory exceptions.

General

Latin for the matter has been decided. At common law, once a court has made a decision, the matter cannot be re-opened once the time limit for appealing or the relevant limitation period has expired.

View the related checklists about Res judicata

Bringing new proceedings after summary judgment or strike out—checklist

Bringing new proceedings after summary judgment or strike out—checklist For guidance on summary judgment and strike out generally, see: Summary judgment and strike out—overview, which includes specific guidance on responding to an application for summary judgment or strike out, see Practice Note: Strike out and summary judgment applications—how to respond. Amendments to CPR Part 24 and CPR PD 24—1 October 2023 Practitioners should note that the CPR provisions relevant to summary judgment were amended with effect from 1 October 2023. CPR Part 24 was substituted and CPR PD 24 was revoked. The changes were intended to simplify the rules, and do not materially alter the substantive law or practice. The numbering and location of some provisions is changed. Accordingly, authorities which pre-date the 1 October 2023 amendments may include reference to the previous provisions and numbering. References in this Checklist are to the wording of CPR Part 24 as currently in force. For tables showing the destination of the old provisions and the derivation of the new provisions, see Practice Note: Summary judgment—CPR Part...

Glossary—Latin legal terms

Glossary—Latin legal terms Despite attempts in recent years to simplify the language used in legal cases, there are still a number of Latin phrases commonly used in personal injury claims. The following Latin phrases are listed in alphabetical order: Latin term Definition Meaning Acta iure imperii Legal acts of public nature Liability of the state for actions or omissions in the exercise of state authority Bona Fide In good faith A Bona Fide agreement is one entered into without intent to deceive Caveat Take care/caution A legal notice to the court to prevent another party taking action without informing the person who gave the notice Compos Mentis Of sound mind Legally fit to conduct the claim De Facto In fact As a matter of fact Ex Gratia As a matter of favour An ex gratia payment is made without any legal or contractual obligation to do so Ex Parte By a party An ex parte application is made to the court by one party in the absence or without...

Conduct of employment tribunal hearings—general

FORTHCOMING CHANGE: On 30 January 2023 the Senior President of Tribunals issued a consultation (with a deadline for responses of 27 March 2023, extended to 27 April 2023) on the redrawing of rules and discretions with regard to when and in what circumstances employment tribunals, and also the Employment Appeal Tribunal, should conduct a hearing with just a judge presiding, or alternatively conduct a hearing with one or more lay members in addition to the judge. In July 2024 the Senior President of Tribunals published his response to the consultation with a draft of the Practice Direction which he intends to issue, taking effect on 29 October 2024. The Senior President of Tribunals proposed that there will be no default position for matters that fall to be decided at or following a final employment tribunal hearing and a judge will decide, having regard to the interests of justice and the overriding objective, whether the tribunal is to consist of: (a) a judge sitting alone, or (b) a judge, an employee member,...

Brussels I—parallel proceedings (art 27) [Archived]

Brussels I—parallel proceedings (art 27) [Archived] ARCHIVED: This Practice Note has been archived and is not maintained. This Practice Note explains what parallel proceedings are, as set out in Regulation (EC) 44/2001, Brussels I together with their impact on the courts dealing with these types of proceedings. The requirements to show that parallel proceedings exist are explained and examples of how they have been applied in practice are provided. Note: since 10 January 2015 Brussels I has been repealed in its entirety and replaced by Brussels I (recast). However, transitional arrangements have been put in place. For information on those arrangements and whether Brussels I provisions still apply to the matter you are dealing with, see Practice Note: E&W Brussels I (recast)—application and exclusions. What are parallel proceedings? Parallel proceedings are: • proceedings are brought in two or more EU Member States • the proceedings run concurrently, and • the proceedings involve: ◦ the same parties ◦ the same causes of action Practical consideration: in terms of what the...

Discover our 139 Practice Notes on Res judicata

Where a claim has been stayed because the respondent company is in administration, is the respondent nevertheless required to submit an ET3 (within the usual timeframe), or can the respondent wait for the stay to be lifted before submitting the ET3?

Where a claim has been stayed because the respondent company is in administration, is the respondent nevertheless required to submit an ET3 (within the usual timeframe), or can the respondent wait for the stay to be lifted before submitting the ET3? Paragraph 43(6) of Schedule B1 to the Insolvency Act 1986 (IA 1986) provides, so far as relevant, as follows: ‘No legal process may be…continued against [a company in administration] except with the consent of the administrator or with the permission of the court’. The ‘court’ in this instance is, exclusively, the Companies Court and not the Employment Tribunal (ET). It has been confirmed by the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) that the ET has no power or discretion to continue with a claim against a company in administration (see Ince Gordon Dadds LLP v Tunstall). That can only be done with the consent of the administrator (which is rarely given, for obvious reasons) or by Order of the Companies Court. The only course available to the...

Does a claimant’s claim continue, where the defendant has a counterclaim, the claimant has failed to file a defence to the counterclaim, or the defendant has applied for default judgment?

Does a claimant’s claim continue, where the defendant has a counterclaim, the claimant has failed to file a defence to the counterclaim, or the defendant has applied for default judgment? This Q&A considers the effect on a claim of default judgment on a counterclaim. This is not a question of procedure as such; it is a matter of res judicata and issue estoppel. As a matter of form, the claim will survive the granting of default judgment on the counterclaim. However, a default judgment is regarded as conclusive of such matters as are strictly necessary for the decision. If the factual connection between the claim and the counterclaim is such that the default judgment on the counterclaim necessarily and with complete precision answers (in the defendant’s favour) the factual questions that the claimant needs to establish in order to prove his claim, then the defendant is able to obtain summary dismissal of the claim. The question was recently discussed in detail, in the case of ...

See the 13 Q&As about Res judicata

Tax weekly highlights—12 December 2024

This week's edition of Tax weekly highlights includes: (1) key announcements from the draft Welsh Budget 2025–26, (2) analysis of the Court of Appeal’s decision in Axa Sun Life plc v HMRC, and (3) the UT’s decision in HMRC v Colchester Institute Corporation.

Dispute Resolution weekly highlights—12 December 2024

This week's edition of Dispute Resolution weekly highlights includes analysis of a number of key DR developments and key judicial decisions including HM Courts and Tribunals Service’s update to its programme of reform in the justice system and the Court of Appeal decision in Manolete Partners plc v White (enforcement); dates for your diary; details of our most recently published content; and other information of general interest to dispute resolution practitioners.

Read the latest 402 News articles on Res judicata

Speed up all aspects of your legal work with tools that help you to work faster and smarter. Win cases, close deals and grow your business–all whilst saving time and reducing risk.

Case studies

"While we began looking at UU��ֱ�� products primarily for cost saving, it quickly became more about customer service, ease of onboarding, ongoing training and breadth of resources available."

Co-Op

Access all documents on Res judicata

GET ACCESS NOW

Top

Trial

UU��ֱ��

GLOSSARY