Did the claimant consent to the risk of injury?


Published by a UUÂãÁÄÖ±²¥ PI & Clinical Negligence expert
Practice notes

Did the claimant consent to the risk of injury?


Published by a UUÂãÁÄÖ±²¥ PI & Clinical Negligence expert

Practice notes
imgtext

The essence of a defence of volenti non fit injuria (‘to a willing person, no injury is done’) is that the claimant understands the danger of the situation and willingly consents to the risk of injury. In such circumstances, should injury occur, the claimant has no reason for complaint.

The defence is often shortened to volenti.

If established, volenti is a complete defence. The justification is that it is not possible to apportion consent and say that a claimant agreed to run certain risks but not others. As such, the defence will only be successful in clear cases.

The volenti defence will rarely be available in claims for breach of statutory duty.

requirements for bringing the defence

Three factors must be present in order to run the defence:

  1. •

    capacity

  2. •

    knowledge and willingness

  3. •

    agreement (express or implied)

Capacity

The claimant must have the capacity to give their consent in the relevant way. Children and those suffering

Powered by Lexis+®
Jurisdiction(s):
United Kingdom
Related legal acts:
Key definition:
Volenti non fit injuria definition
What does Volenti non fit injuria mean?

A defence based upon the claimant consenting to the risk of injury suffered.

Read more

Popular documents

Where a claimant has obtained default judgment pursuant to CPR 12.4(1) will the court order a disposal

Where a claimant has obtained default judgment pursuant to CPR 12.4(1) will the court order a disposal hearing or allocate the case to a track and give standard fast track directions?Setting aside default judgmentWhere a claimant has obtained default judgment, a defendant may still wish to defend

Assumption of risk in sports and leisure claims

Assumption of risk in sports and leisure claimsMany sports and leisure activities carry an inherent risk of injury. Participating in an extreme sport or leisure activity can make it alluring and exciting but even common and less dangerous activities and sports such as cycling, swimming, playing

Vicarious liability in the course of employment—the close connection test

Vicarious liability in the course of employment—the close connection testTo identify the circumstances in which a court may find an employer to be vicariously liable for a tort committed by an employee it is useful to trace the development of the doctrine.Salmond testHistorically, the test to be

Burden of proof in personal injury claims

Burden of proof in personal injury claimsBalance of probabilitiesThe claimant must prove that, on the balance of probabilities, the defendant has been negligent or has breached their statutory duties. Proof on the balance of probabilities means proof that it is more likely than not. If the