UUÂãÁÄÖ±²¥

Legal News

No substitute for compliance with the environmental impact assessment regulations—permission for a proposed ‘net zero’ coal mine quashed (South Lakeland Action on Climate Change—Towards Transition v Secretary of State for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities)

Published on: 14 October 2024

Table of contents

  • What are the practical implications of this case?
  • What was the background?
  • What did the court decide?
  • Case details

Article summary

Planning analysis: This case concerned the lawful approach to environmental impact assessments (EIAs) and ‘substitution’ arguments in the context of fossil fuel developments following the Supreme Court’s decision in R (oao Finch) v Surrey County Council and others [2024] UKSC 20. The court found that the Secretary of State had acted in breach of the Town and Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2011 (the 2011 regulations) in determining the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from the burning of coal from the proposed mine were not likely indirect significant effects of the development, applying Finch. Written by Rowan Clapp, a barrister at Cornerstone Barristers.

Popular documents