UUÂãÁÄÖ±²¥

Victimisation

Produced by Tolley in association with
Employment Tax
Guidance

Victimisation

Produced by Tolley in association with
Employment Tax
Guidance
imgtext

Individuals who speak up to assert their rights under the Equality Act 2010 (EqA 2010) run the potential risk that they will be treated badly in retaliation. Not protecting working individuals who assert those rights would potentially entirely undermine the protection they enjoy against discrimination. The concept of unlawful victimisation exists to safeguard an individual's ability to assert their rights safely.

A person victimises an individual if:

  1. •

    subject that individual to a detriment

  2. •

    they do so because that individual has done, or may do a protected act

See Example 1 for a basic illustration.

In other words, in order to determine whether victimisation has occurred the following three step test can be used:

  1. •

    did the individual undertake a protected act (or the perpetrator believed that he had done so or may do so)?

  2. •

    has the individual been subjected to a detriment?

  3. •

    has the individual been subjected to that detriment because they have done (or the perpetrator believed they had done or may do) the protected act?

If

Access this article and thousands of others like it
free for 7 days with a trial of Tolley+™ Guidance.

Emma Bartlett
Emma Bartlett

Partner at Charles Russell Speechlys LLP


Emma advises on all aspects of employment law including unlawful discrimination, whistleblowing, equal pay, unfair dismissal, breach of contract, restrictive covenants, protecting confidential information, boardroom disputes and claims under TUPE. She has experience in obtaining and executing interim injunctions for breach of confidentiality and/or restrictive covenant provisions. She also leads diversity issues for Charles Russell Speechlys employment team.   With a strong record in negotiating and resolving complex employment disputes, Emma is considered a skilled deal broker. She is a specialist in contentious discrimination matters and has significant experience in handling high value contentious claims for employers and senior individuals. Emma acts for employers, employees and trade unions. Her client base is broad, both in terms of the range of work and the sectors in which they operate. Amongst these clients are a number of growing, dynamic businesses (including UK start-ups), as well as long established financial institutions, and senior executives.   Emma speaks regularly on diversity issues, edits the diversity sections of Lawtel Employment Precedents and Company Policy Documents and certain diversity sections of Tolley Guidance Employment Tax online, and regularly contributes to article in HR and legal publications as well as comments in the national press on diversity issues.   Experience Successfully defended a tribunal claim of race and religious discrimination against a household name private members club. Added complications arose as the matter was reported in the press before judgment was given. An appeal to the Employment Appeals Tribunal was rejected. Advised and represented a large London retailer in relation to a multi-discrimination employment tribunal complaint (direct, indirect, victimisation and harassment based on race and religion). The claim was complicated by the variety of allegations and the worker's status; there were three preliminary hearings before a full merits hearing was listed. There were also four named Respondents to the claim. Successfully settled the action for a nominal sum, with agreement that all allegations were retracted and not repeated despite the action continuing against the other Respondents. Advised and negotiated service agreements for the senior management team of the seller on a multimillion pound share sale of a UK business. A major legal victory for a pilot employed by a household name airline, in a landmark case against the airline for indirect age discrimination. The decision has industry-wide ramifications for airlines and other organisations which provide a combination of long-term permanent health insurance or similar income protection payments via third party and self-insurance.

Powered by
  • 14 Sep 2022 10:47

Popular Articles

Wholly and exclusively

Wholly and exclusivelyFor both income tax and corporation tax purposes, one of the fundamental conditions that must be satisfied for an item of expenditure to be deductible, is that it must incurred ‘wholly and exclusively’ for the purposes of the trade, profession or vocation. References to CTA

14 Jul 2020 14:00 | Produced by Tolley Read more Read more

Substantial shareholding exemption ― overview

Substantial shareholding exemption ― overviewThe substantial shareholdings exemption (SSE) provides a complete exemption from the liability to corporation tax on the gains generated from qualifying disposals of shares and interests in shares by qualifying companies. No claim is required. Provided

14 Jul 2020 13:44 | Produced by Tolley Read more Read more

VAT registration ― artificial separation of business activities (disaggregation)

VAT registration ― artificial separation of business activities (disaggregation)This guidance note should be read in conjunction with the VAT registration ― compulsory guidance note and is relevant to persons established or resident in the UK. Persons that are not established or resident in the UK

14 Jul 2020 13:57 | Produced by Tolley Read more Read more