Injunctive relief Definition

GLOSSARY

Published by a UU��ֱ�� Family expert

What does Injunctive relief mean?

In the context of family relationships, the powers of the court to give protection to a victim of domestic violence, or to secure financial assets in order to prevent their dissipation, or the setting aside of financial transactions made with the intention of defeating a financial claim.

The Family Law Act 1996, pt 4 enables a victim of violence to apply for protective orders to prevent violence or threats of violence and/or to remove an abusive partner from the home or from an area around the home.

View the related checklists about Injunctive relief

Ownership and issues regarding copyright works created at home—checklist

Ownership and issues regarding copyright works created at home—checklist Employees and contractors are increasingly working more from home. This has resulted in an increase in content being created at home and posted or shared online, for example by teachers to share with their pupils via video communications. When content is created at home in these circumstances, the ownership of IP rights, use of third-party material and infringement of third-party rights should be considered. For further information on issues raised by this Checklist, see Practice Notes: • Copyright—protectable works • Copyright—authorship and ownership • Copyright & associated rights—overview • Copyright infringement • Copyright—secondary infringement • Copyright infringement—remedies • Copyright—permitted acts and defences • Joint ownership of intellectual property rights The third column can be used to record observations or comments as the Checklist is worked through. Checklist Further information Notes (if any) Copyright origination ☐ Identify the copyright work. Copyright is an unregistered right—it comes into being automatically on the creation of a qualifying work.The main categories of ‘work’ are:—literary,...

Ireland—Contracting on another party’s standard terms and conditions (B2B)—checklist

Ireland—Contracting on another party’s standard terms and conditions (B2B)—checklist This Checklist sets out the key issues to consider when contracting on another party’s standard form terms and conditions. This Checklist is relevant for business-to-business terms transactions only. Unless you have a very strong bargaining position, you will have to deal on other’s standard terms from time to time, especially when you are buying goods and/or services. How far you want to go in challenging the standard form terms of another party will depend on the overall importance of the contract, its length and value and the importance to your business of the goods or services supplied. A key issue when faced with third party terms is extending the supplier’s liability so that their duty towards you is greater and maximising the extent of your recoverable losses if the supplier fails to perform satisfactorily. Incorporation of your requirements Ensure any specific terms or requirements are effectively incorporated. You should try and include as many of your requirements as possible as specific...

Non-molestation orders

This Practice Note explains the criteria that the court must have regard to when considering an application for a non-molestation order under Part IV of the Family Law Act 1996 (FLA 1996). It explains who can apply for a non-molestation order and who are associated persons under FLA 1996, Pt IV. It also considers the definition of molestation. It contains a summary of the provisions in the Domestic Abuse Act 2021 (DAA 2021).Under the Family Law Act 1996 (FLA 1996) a non-molestation order is an order prohibiting a person (the respondent) from molesting another person who is associated with the respondent or a relevant child.The court can make a non-molestation order: •if an application for the order has been made (whether in other family proceedings or without any other family proceedings being instituted) by a person who is associated with the respondent, or•if in any family proceedings to which the respondent is a party, the court considers that the order should be made for the benefit of any other party...

Occupation orders

Occupation ordersAn occupation order is an order under the Family Law Act 1996 (FLA 1996) conferring, declaring, restricting or regulating rights of occupation in the family home between parties who are in, or who have been in, certain categories of relationship.Essentially, an occupation order will be either a declaratory order or a regulatory order.Declaratory orders are those:•declaring existing occupation rights in the home•extending statutory occupation rights beyond the termination of the marriage on divorce or death•granting occupation rights in the home to the non-entitled applicants (an occupation rights order)Regulatory orders available are those:•requiring one party to leave the home•suspending occupation rights and/or prohibiting one party from entering or re-entering the home, or part of the home•requiring one party to allow the other to enter and/or remain in the home•regulating the occupation of the home by either or both of the parties•terminating occupation rights, and•excluding one party from a defined area in the vicinity of the homeFor the procedure for an application for an occupation order see Practice Note: Procedure for an...

Discover our 343 Practice Notes on Injunctive relief

Systems integration agreement—pro-supplier

Systems integration agreement—pro-supplier This AgrEement is made on [date] Parties 1 [insert name of supplier], a company incorporated in [England and Wales] under number [insert registered number] whose registered office is at [insert address] (Supplier); and 2 [insert name of customer], a company incorporated in [England and Wales] under number [insert registered number] whose registered office is at [insert address] (Customer) (each of the Supplier and the Customer being a party and together the Supplier and the Customer are the parties). Background (A) The Customer wishes to procure software, [hardware], software configuration and development services, installation services and other related services. (B) The Customer has agreed to procure the Services from the Supplier and the Supplier has agreed to provide the Services to the Customer on the terms and conditions of this Agreement. The parties agree as follows: 1 Definitions and Interpretation 1.1 In this Agreement the following terms have the following meanings: Acceptance • means that: (a) the Customer confirms in writing that the...

MVNO agreement

MVNO agreement This Agreement is made on [insert date] Parties 1 [insert name] a company incorporated in [England and Wales] under number [insert registered number] whose registered office is at [insert address] (Supplier); and 2 [insert name] a company incorporated in [England and Wales] under number [insert registered number] whose registered office is at [insert address] (MVNO) (each of the Supplier and the MVNO being a party and together the Supplier and the MVNO are the parties). Background (A) The Supplier is a mobile network operator in the Territory. (B) The MVNO is a mobile virtual network operator in the Territory. (C) The Supplier has agreed to provide wholesale mobile electronic communications services to the MVNO for resale [on a pre-pay basis OR on a post-pay basis OR on a pre-pay and post-pay basis] in the Territory in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement. The parties agree: 1 Definitions and interpretation 1.1 In this Agreement: Account Manager • means the primary point...

Dive into our 39 Precedents related to Injunctive relief

Can a part-time, fixed-term or term-time only employee be prevented from working elsewhere during the times they are not working for the employer?

Can a part-time, fixed-term or term-time only employee be prevented from working elsewhere during the times they are not working for the employer? An employee will be under certain implied duties during employment. These will vary depending on the seniority of the employee and whether they are subject to a duty of fidelity or a more onerous fiduciary duty. For further details, see Practice Note: The duty of fidelity and fiduciary duties. An employer may wish to confirm or supplement these implied duties by seeking to restrain an employee from undertaking any business activities other than those of the employer during employment, whether within or outside working hours. For further guidance on these provisions generally, see the section of Practice Note: Restrictions and other express terms during employment entitled ‘Restrictions on other business activities’. Consideration should be given to whether any ban on spare time business activity should be total or partial: • a total ban seeks to prevent any business activity—this would typically be more appropriate for a senior,...

Can an application under section 37 of the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 for a freezing order be made after a final order has been granted?

Can an application under section 37 of the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 for a freezing order be made after a final order has been granted? Section 37 of the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 (MCA 1973) is a powerful weapon. It enables the court to restrain a proposed disposition of an asset, or to set aside a disposition of an asset. As a result, a party who seeks to, for example, transfer property to a family member with a view to it falling outside of the matrimonial pot can be thwarted by the operation of the section. The disposition must be made with the intention of defeating the claim of a spouse for financial relief, which is a high bar; however pursuant to MCA 1973, s 37(5), this intention is presumed (though the presumption is rebuttable) where the disposition was made within three years of the date of the application to set aside the disposition. The section does not apply to dispositions made for valuable consideration to a bona fide third...

See the 85 Q&As about Injunctive relief

DIFC Court of First Instance orders parties to bear their own costs (Neven v Nole)

Arbitration analysis: By order of 25 September 2024, Justice Moran of the DIFCCFI, applying the Rules of the DIFC Courts 2014 (the RDC), declined the parties’ application for costs, ordering each party to bear its own costs, with respect to Neven’s application for interim relief in support of arbitration in circumstances in which part of the relief was plainly without merit and the remainder of the relief was met by Nole by entering into an undertaking in favour of Neven with respect to certain corporate transactions that were the subject of a dispute between the parties in arbitration. Written by Dr Gordon Blanke, founding principal at Blanke Arbitration Dubai/London/Paris.

Banking and Finance weekly highlights—21 November 2024

This week's edition of Banking and Finance weekly highlights includes: (1) the decision in Kireeva v Bedzhamov where the Supreme Court has unanimously dismissed Ms Kireeva’s (Russian bankruptcy trustee’s) appeal to overturn the Court of Appeal’s’ decision; (2) HMLR announces changes to addresses for business customers; and (3) HMT consults on the case for a UK Green Taxonomy.

Read the latest 673 News articles on Injunctive relief

Speed up all aspects of your legal work with tools that help you to work faster and smarter. Win cases, close deals and grow your business–all whilst saving time and reducing risk.

Case studies

"In some areas of research there were also significant time savings. You get to what you are looking for more quickly, which all goes to the value of the product."

Harper Mcleod

Access all documents on Injunctive relief

GET ACCESS NOW

Top

Trial

UU��ֱ��

GLOSSARY