Burden and standard of proof in criminal proceedings


Published by a UUÂãÁÄÖ±²¥ Corporate Crime expert
Practice notes

Burden and standard of proof in criminal proceedings


Published by a UUÂãÁÄÖ±²¥ Corporate Crime expert

Practice notes
imgtext

There are two kinds of ‘burden’ in criminal proceedings:

  1. •

    the legal burden, and

  2. •

    the evidential burden

The legal burden

A party has the legal (sometimes called ‘the persuasive’) burden where the onus is on that party to prove a fact or issue in a case to the required Standard of proof.

The legal burden is generally on the prosecution (subject to certain exceptions as explained below). This means that where the defendant pleads not guilty, the prosecution have the burden of proving all the elements of the offence (eg the identity of the defendant, the nature of the act, the existence of any necessary knowledge or intent and the negating of any defences which are raised). It includes proving negative elements of an offence (eg lack of consent in a rape or assault case). It is for the jury or magistrates to determine whether the burden has been discharged.

Whichever decision making tribunal is responsible for making this decision, it must be clear that it has applied the correct test. Failures

Powered by Lexis+®
Jurisdiction(s):
United Kingdom
Related legal acts:
Key definition:
Standard of proof definition
What does Standard of proof mean?

Matters requiring proof must be established to the appropriate standard, namely either on the balance of probabilities or beyond reasonable doubt.

Read more

Popular documents

Private prosecutions face overhaul after post office scandal

Law360, London: The government is considering changing the rules that govern how companies can bring private prosecutions amid growing public scrutiny of the way the Post Office went after innocent sub-postmasters in the Horizon IT scandal.

Application to dismiss

Application to dismissApplication to dismissUnder paragraph 2(1) of Schedule 3 to the Crime and Disorder Act 1998 (CDA 1998), the defendant may (after the date when he is served with the documents containing the evidence on which the charge(s) are based, but before the date of arraignment) apply

Scotland—the process for applying for sequestration

Scotland—the process for applying for sequestrationSequestration in Scotland is the legal process by which an insolvent debtor’s estate is gathered in, realised and then distributed among their creditors by a trustee appointed for that purpose. The process requires that a formal award of

What is the difference between an appeal and a review?

What is the difference between an appeal and a review?What is an appeal?An appeal in insolvency proceedings is no different to an appeal in normal litigation. An appeal will be allowed only if the appeal court is satisfied that the decision of the lower court was 'wrong' or 'unjust because of a