Remedies in judicial review

Produced in partnership with Gabriel Tan of Wilson Solicitors LLP
Practice notes

Remedies in judicial review

Produced in partnership with Gabriel Tan of Wilson Solicitors LLP

Practice notes
imgtext

Overview

The types of remedies that can be awarded on an application for judicial review are contained in section 31 of the Senior Courts Act 1981 (SCA 1981). They include:

  1. •

    quashing orders

  2. •

    mandatory orders

  3. •

    prohibiting orders

  4. •

    declarations

  5. •

    damages (including restitution or recovery of a sum due)

  6. •

    injunctions/interim remedies

On an application for judicial review, the claimant must specify any remedy they are claiming in the claim form (CPR 54.6). SCA 1981, s 31(1) permits the remedies to be claimed as alternatives, or in addition to each other. For further information, see: Combining prerogative orders: Supperstone, Goudie and Walker on Judicial Review [16.2]. In this regard, a judicial decision that a claim for judicial review has succeeded is not, generally, sufficient to dispose of a claim (see R (LND1) v The Secretary of State for the Home Department at para [61]).

Remedial discretion in judicial review

It is a fundamental principle that remedies in public law are discretionary (see R (Imam) v Croydon London Borough Council at

Gabriel Tan
Gabriel Tan

Public Law Caseworker, Wilson Solicitors LLP


Gabriel is a Public Law caseworker at Wilson Solicitors, specialising in judicial reviews and civil claims against public authorities. He has experience in public law matters across a wide-range of issues, including policy challenges, and the consultation duties of public authorities, amongst others.
Ìý
Gabriel has had conduct of litigation before the County Court, Upper Tribunal, the Administrative Court, and the Court of Appeal. He has been instructed by individuals, as well as NGOs, both in litigation and general research matters.
Ìý
Gabriel writes regularly and has been published across a wide range of publications on various aspects of public law, including academic journals (e.g. Public Law, Edinburgh Law Review), academic blogs (e.g. UK Constitutional Law Association Blog), and practitioners’ publications (e.g. Free Movement).
Ìý
Gabriel also has experience in public law academic research, having been a Research Associate at Durham Law School working on an empirical project on the duty of candour in judicial review.
Ìý
Gabriel is an active commentator on public law on Twitter (@finishedloading) and writes his own blog, the Administrative Court Blog (@admcourtblog), where he provides regular case notes and commentary on Administrative Court decisions.

Powered by Lexis+®
Jurisdiction(s):
United Kingdom

Popular documents