512 Provision of meals etc at schools maintained by [local authorities][512 [Local authority] functions concerning provision of meals, etc]
Education Act 1996 (1996 c 56) | Legislation

512  Provision of meals etc at schools maintained by [local authorities][512 [Local authority] functions concerning provision of meals, etc]

[(1)     A [local authority] may provide—

(a)     registered pupils at any school maintained by the authority,

(b)     other persons who receive education at such a school, and

(c)     children who receive relevant funded nursery education [relevant funded early years education],

with milk, meals and other refreshments.

(2)     Where provision is made under subsection (1), it shall be made—

(a)     in a case within paragraph (a) or (b) of that subsection, either on the school premises or at any other place where education is being provided, and

(b)     in a case within paragraph (c) of that subsection, at any place where education is being provided.

(3)     A [local authority] shall exercise their power under subsection (1) to provide school lunches for any person within paragraph (a) or (c) of that subsection if—

(a)     any prescribed requirements are met,

(b)     a request for the provision of school lunches has been made by or on

Powered by Lexis+®
 

Popular documents

LEXISNEXIS

Serving outside the jurisdiction with court permission—application and order

This Practice Note addresses issues when serving out of the jurisdiction and the permission of the court is required. It explains how to make an application and the form of order required. An application to serve out of the jurisdiction is generally made without notice and on the papers. Key

LEXISNEXIS

Costs and the ‘without prejudice’ rule

Costs and the ‘without prejudice’ ruleCosts determination and the ‘without prejudice’ ruleAn issue for practitioners is whether correspondence marked ‘without prejudice’ can be used against a party when the court comes to determine the issue of costs. The Court of Appeal in Walker v Wilsher (1889)

LEXISNEXIS

Mistake in contract law

Mistake in contract lawThis Practice Note considers the legal concept of mistake in contract law. It examines common mistake, mutual mistake, unilateral mistake, mistake as to identity and mistake as to the document signed (non est factum). It also considers the impact of each of these types of

LEXISNEXIS

Section 2(1) of the Misrepresentation Act 1967 allows a claimant to claim damages for non-fraudulent

Section 2(1) of the Misrepresentation Act 1967 allows a claimant to claim damages for non-fraudulent misrepresentation, unless the representor can prove they had reasonable grounds for believing the statement to be true. If the representor had reasonable grounds for believing the statement to be