438 Choice of school: child without [EHC plan or] statement of special educational needs [, or an individual development plan which names a school]
Education Act 1996 (1996 c 56) | Legislation

438  Choice of school: child without [EHC plan or] statement of special educational needs [, or an individual development plan which names a school]

(1)     This section applies where a [local authority] are required by virtue of section 437(3) to serve a school attendance order in respect of a child, other than a child for whom they maintain [an EHC plan (in the case of a local authority in England) or] a statement under section 324 [a child for whom an individual development plan is maintained in which a particular school is named] [(in the case of a local authority in Wales)].

(2)     Before serving the order, the authority shall serve on the parent a notice in writing—

(a)     informing him of their intention to serve the order,

(b)     specifying the school which the authority intend to name in the order

Powered by Lexis+®
 

Popular documents

LEXISNEXIS

Subrogation in insurance and reinsurance

Subrogation in insurance and reinsuranceWhat is the right of subrogation?In the context of insurance and reinsurance, the right of subrogation entitles an insurer or reinsurer, having indemnified the (re)insured, to ‘step into its shoes’ to bring an action in the (re)insured’s name. For the purpose

LEXISNEXIS

Mortgagees and tenants

Mortgagee’s consent to grant of leaseIf a property is subject to a mortgage that prohibits leasing without the mortgagee’s consent, then written evidence of consent must be obtained prior to completion of the lease. On the grant of an underlease, mortgagee’s consent in respect of any mortgage over

LEXISNEXIS

Control of asbestos—duty to manage

The Control of Asbestos Regulations 2012 (CAR 2012) place various duties on employers to protect employees from risks related to exposure to asbestos and make it clear that these duties, so far as is reasonably practicable, are also owed to any other person, whether at work or not, who may be

LEXISNEXIS

Resulting trusts

Resulting trusts represent one of the three types of trust which do not require to be declared or evidenced in writing. The others are constructive and implied trusts, although it is perhaps doubtful whether there is any form of implied trust which is not in fact either a resulting trust or a