167 Determination of appeals
Education Act 2002 (2002 c 32) | Legislation

167  Determination of appeals

(1)     This section applies where an appeal is made under section 166 to the [First-tier Tribunal].

(2)     In the case of an appeal against a refusal under section 162 to approve a material change, the tribunal may—

(a)     uphold the refusal to approve, or

(b)     itself approve the change.

(3)     In the case of an appeal against a determination under section 165 to remove the school from the register, the tribunal may—

(a)     uphold the determination, or

(b)     revoke the determination.

(4)     Where under subsection (3)(a) the tribunal upholds a determination, the registration authority shall remove the school

Powered by Lexis+®
 

Popular documents

LEXISNEXIS

Third party rights—the common law doctrine of privity of contract

Third party rights—the common law doctrine of privity of contractThis Practice Note discusses the common law doctrine of privity of contract; the equitable and statutory exceptions to it; how the doctrine affects enforcing a contract against a third party and what happens when, notwithstanding the

LEXISNEXIS

Common assault and battery

Common assault and batteryThe offences of common assault and batteryTechnically, the offences of assault and battery are separate summary offences. An assault is committed when the defendant intentionally or recklessly causes another to apprehend immediate and unlawful violence and battery is

LEXISNEXIS

Criminal damage

Criminal damageGeneralSimple criminal damage is triable either way unless the value of the alleged damage is £5,000 or less, in which case the offence will be treated as if it were triable only summarily.Where the damage is caused by fire or the racially aggravated form of the offence is charged,

LEXISNEXIS

Resulting trusts

Resulting trusts represent one of the three types of trust which do not require to be declared or evidenced in writing. The others are constructive and implied trusts, although it is perhaps doubtful whether there is any form of implied trust which is not in fact either a resulting trust or a