[192XA Rules applying to holding companies]
Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (2000 c 8) | Legislation

[Rules]

[192XA  Rules applying to holding companies]

[(1)     The PRA may make rules described in subsection (2) applying to financial holding companies and mixed financial holding companies that are—

(a)     approved under section 192R, or

(b)     designated under section 192T(2)(c),

where it appears to the PRA to be necessary or expedient to make the rules for the purpose of advancing any of its objectives.

(2)     Those rules are—

(a)     rules imposing requirements to be complied with by holding companies on a consolidated or sub-consolidated basis;

(b)     rules imposing requirements which, in the PRA's opinion, are likely to mitigate group risk;

(c)     rules imposing reporting requirements related to requirements described in paragraph (a) or (b);

(d)     rules imposing public disclosure requirements related to

Powered by Lexis+®
 

Popular documents

LEXISNEXIS

What is electronic money?

What is electronic money?BREXIT: 11pm (GMT) on 31 December 2020 (‘IP completion day’) marked the end of the Brexit transition/implementation period entered into following the UK’s withdrawal from the EU. Following IP completion day, key transitional arrangements come to an end and significant

LEXISNEXIS

The Financial Assistance Scheme—what are the available benefits?

The Financial Assistance Scheme—what are the available benefits?THIS PRACTICE NOTE APPLIES TO SCHEMES ENTERING THE FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE SCHEME FROM 1 JANUARY 2012.Where a scheme, its employer(s) and individual members have satisfied the criteria for eligibility into the Financial Assistance Scheme

LEXISNEXIS

Indirect effect of EU law

Indirect effect of EU lawWhat is indirect effect of EU law?The doctrine of indirect effect, or consistent interpretation, is a duty that national courts have, as part of the Member State responsible for fulfilment of EU obligations, to interpret national law in light of EU law, especially with

LEXISNEXIS

Nuisance and the rule in Rylands v Fletcher—common law liability for pollution

Private nuisancePrivate nuisance is an unlawful interference with a person's use or enjoyment of land or some right over or in connection with it. Interference must be unreasonable, and may be caused, eg by water, smoke, smell, fumes, gas, noise, heat or vibrations. Where the defendant has not