[Part IA Penalty for Breach of Paragraph 26(2) or (3)]
Immigration Act 1971 (1971 c 77) | Legislation

[Part IA Penalty for Breach of Paragraph 26(2) or (3)]

[Penalty for breach of paragraph 26(2) or (3)

28

(1)     Sub-paragraph (2) applies where the Secretary of State has given written notice under paragraph 26(2) to the owner or agent of an aircraft—

(a)     designating a control area for the embarkation or disembarkation of passengers in an airport in the United Kingdom, and

(b)     specifying conditions or restrictions to be observed in the control area.

(2)     The Secretary of State may impose a penalty on the owner or agent if the owner or agent fails to take all reasonable steps to secure that—

(a)     passengers embarking on or disembarking from the aircraft at the airport do not embark or disembark at the airport outside the control area, or

(b)     the conditions or restrictions specified in the notice are observed.

(3)     Sub-paragraph (4) applies where the Secretary of State has given written notice under paragraph 26(3) to a person concerned with the management of an airport in the United Kingdom—

(a)     designating a control area in the airport, and

(b)     specifying conditions or restrictions to be observed in the control area.

(4)     The Secretary of State

Powered by Lexis+®
 

Popular documents

LEXISNEXIS

Third party rights—the common law doctrine of privity of contract

Third party rights—the common law doctrine of privity of contractThis Practice Note discusses the common law doctrine of privity of contract; the equitable and statutory exceptions to it; how the doctrine affects enforcing a contract against a third party and what happens when, notwithstanding the

LEXISNEXIS

Costs and the ‘without prejudice’ rule

Costs and the ‘without prejudice’ ruleCosts determination and the ‘without prejudice’ ruleAn issue for practitioners is whether correspondence marked ‘without prejudice’ can be used against a party when the court comes to determine the issue of costs. The Court of Appeal in Walker v Wilsher (1889)

LEXISNEXIS

Resulting trusts

Resulting trusts represent one of the three types of trust which do not require to be declared or evidenced in writing. The others are constructive and implied trusts, although it is perhaps doubtful whether there is any form of implied trust which is not in fact either a resulting trust or a

LEXISNEXIS

The British Franchise Association (BFA)

The British Franchise Association (BFA)This Practice Note examines the role and remit of the British Franchise Association (the BFA) in the franchise industry in the UK. It looks at the legislative and regulatory framework in the franchise industry, the membership criteria of the BFA, the BFA’s Code