255 Further provision about notices under section 252 or 253
Investigatory Powers Act 2016 (2016 c 25) | Legislation

255  Further provision about notices under section 252 or 253

(1)     In this section “relevant notice” means—

(a)     a national security notice under section 252, or

(b)     a technical capability notice under section 253.

(2)     Before giving a relevant notice to a person, the Secretary of State must consult that person.

(3)     Before giving a relevant notice, the Secretary of State must, among other matters, take into account—

(a)     the likely benefits of the notice,

(b)     the likely number of users (if known) of any postal or telecommunications service to which the notice relates,

(c)     the technical feasibility of complying with the notice,

(d)     the likely cost of complying with the notice, and

(e)     any other effect of the notice on the person (or description of person) to whom it relates.

(4)     In the case of a technical capability notice that would impose any obligations relating to the removal by a person of electronic protection applied by or on behalf of that person to

Powered by Lexis+®
 

Popular documents

LEXISNEXIS

The Money Laundering Reporting Officer (MLRO)

The Money Laundering Reporting Officer (MLRO)OverviewThe requirements to have robust systems and controls in a regulated firm to prevent money laundering originate from:•the Money Laundering, Terrorist Financing and Transfer of Funds (Information on the Payer) Regulations 2017, SI 2017/692 (as

LEXISNEXIS

Sentencing fraud offences committed by individuals

Sentencing fraud offences committed by individualsThe Sentencing Council (SC) has produced sentencing guidelines for fraud offences under the Fraud Act 2006 (fraud by false representation, fraud by failing to disclose information and fraud by abuse of position), false accounting under section 17 of

LEXISNEXIS

Nuisance and the rule in Rylands v Fletcher—common law liability for pollution

Private nuisancePrivate nuisance is an unlawful interference with a person's use or enjoyment of land or some right over or in connection with it. Interference must be unreasonable, and may be caused, eg by water, smoke, smell, fumes, gas, noise, heat or vibrations. Where the defendant has not

LEXISNEXIS

A chargor (an individual) is granting a legal charge to a chargee (a company). Can an employee of the

There does not appear to be any evidence that an employee of the chargee cannot witness the chargor’s signature.Practice Note: Property deeds—use and execution of deeds in property transactions, provides guidance on who may witness the signature of a deed by an individual:‘There are certain