SCHEDULE 4 Survivor's Pension Under Section 7: Up-rating
Pensions Act 2014 (2014 c 19) | Legislation

SCHEDULE 4 Survivor's Pension Under Section 7: Up-rating

Section 7

Introduction

1

This Schedule sets out how to up-rate the rate of a person's state pension under section 7.

2

In this Schedule a reference to the rate of a person's state pension is to the rate—

(a)     ignoring any reduction under section 7(4) (in the case of a state pension under section 7),

(b)     taking into account any reduction under section 14 (in the case of a state pension under section 4), and

(c)     ignoring any increase under section 17.

3

In this Schedule a reference to “the amount of any state pension that has priority†means the rate of any state pension to which the person is entitled under section 2, 4 or 12.

Rate

Powered by Lexis+®
 

Popular documents

LEXISNEXIS

179. List of offences triable either way.

  Without prejudice to any other enactment by virtue of which any offence is triable either way1, the following offences are triable either way2:  (1)     offences at common law of public nuisance3;  (2)     an offence at common law of

LEXISNEXIS

Mistake in contract law

Mistake in contract lawThis Practice Note considers the legal concept of mistake in contract law. It examines common mistake, mutual mistake, unilateral mistake, mistake as to identity and mistake as to the document signed (non est factum). It also considers the impact of each of these types of

LEXISNEXIS

Financial Conduct Authority—Principles for Businesses (PRIN)

Financial Conduct Authority—Principles for Businesses (PRIN)This Practice Note explains the Principles for Businesses (PRIN) set down by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA). The Principles form part of the FCA’s High Level Standards set out in the FCA’s Handbook. The Principles are a general

LEXISNEXIS

Section 2(1) of the Misrepresentation Act 1967 allows a claimant to claim damages for non-fraudulent

Section 2(1) of the Misrepresentation Act 1967 allows a claimant to claim damages for non-fraudulent misrepresentation, unless the representor can prove they had reasonable grounds for believing the statement to be true. If the representor had reasonable grounds for believing the statement to be