77 Minor amendments
Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 (2012 c 9) | Legislation

77  Minor amendments

(1)     In the Policing and Crime Act 2009 omit—

(a)     section 87(2) (which, if commenced, would insert sections 34A to 34C into the Safeguarding Vulnerable Groups Act 2006 in connection with the notification of proposals to include persons in barred lists), and

(b)     section 89(6) (which, if commenced, would amend the power of the Secretary of State in the Act of 2006 to examine records of convictions or cautions in connection with barring decisions).

(2)     In section 39 of the Safeguarding Vulnerable Groups Act 2006 (duty of local authorities to refer)—

(a)     in subsection (1)—

(i)     for “must” substitute “may”, and

(ii)     omit “prescribed”,

(b)     in subsection (4)—

(i)     in

Powered by Lexis+®
 

Popular documents

LEXISNEXIS

Sentencing fraud offences committed by individuals

Sentencing fraud offences committed by individualsThe Sentencing Council (SC) has produced sentencing guidelines for fraud offences under the Fraud Act 2006 (fraud by false representation, fraud by failing to disclose information and fraud by abuse of position), false accounting under section 17 of

LEXISNEXIS

Unless orders

Unless ordersThis Practice Note provides guidance on the interpretation and application of the relevant provisions of the CPR. Depending on the court in which your matter is proceeding, you may also need to be mindful of additional provisions—see further below.This Practice Note provides guidance on

LEXISNEXIS

Legal Services Board

Legal Services BoardThe Legal Services Board (LSB) is the single independent oversight regulator of the legal profession and sector in England and Wales. It does not directly regulate individual lawyers and, in most circumstances, will not directly regulate firms.Mandate and structureThe LSB is the

LEXISNEXIS

Indirect effect of EU law

Indirect effect of EU lawWhat is indirect effect of EU law?The doctrine of indirect effect, or consistent interpretation, is a duty that national courts have, as part of the Member State responsible for fulfilment of EU obligations, to interpret national law in light of EU law, especially with