More sections of this document available when you sign-in to Lexis+ or register for a free trial.
This week's edition of Dispute Resolution weekly highlights includes analysis of a number of key DR developments and key judicial decisions including: the Civil Justice Committee’s response to the consultation on contempt of court and the Court of Appeal decision in Clifford Chance LLP v Societe Generale SA (jurisdiction agreement); dates for your diary; details of our most recently published content; and other information of general interest to dispute resolution practitioners.
To continue reading this news article, as well as thousands of others like it, sign in with UUÂãÁÄÖ±²¥ or register for a free trial
EXISTING USER? SIGN IN CONTINUE READING GET A QUOTE
To read the full news article, register for a free Lexis+ trial
**Trials are provided to all UUÂãÁÄÖ±²¥ content, excluding Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance, subscription packages are tailored to your specific needs. To discuss trialling these UUÂãÁÄÖ±²¥ services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK, Ireland and selected UK overseas territories and Caribbean countries. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.
* denotes a required field
Online Civil Money Claims pilot scheme—CPR PD 51RThis Practice Note considers CPR PD 51R, which establishes a pilot scheme to test an online claims process for money claims in the County Court called the OCMC pilot (CPR PD 51R, para 2.1). The pilot is available for use by unrepresented parties
Damages claims pilot scheme—CPR PD 51ZBThis Practice Note considers CPR PD 51ZB, which deals with a pilot scheme to test an online claims process for County Court damages claims where parties are represented by a legal representative who is registered with the service. The claims are managed using
A claim form has been served under protective proceedings and it has subsequently come to light that the value of the claim is much higher. Does the claim form need to be amended and a further court fee paid?Additional court feeFor information on the fee that is payable when starting a claim, see
Financial clean break orders in family proceedingsDuty of the court to consider a clean breakAlthough there is no presumption in favour of there being a financial clean break between parties on divorce, the court is under a duty to consider whether it would be appropriate to exercise its powers so
0330 161 1234