More sections of this document available when you sign-in to Lexis+ or register for a free trial.
This week's edition of Family weekly highlights includes analysis of the role of public bodies in forced marriage cases, a reminder about changes to HMCTS Cloud Video Platform and the Video Hearings Service and details of the new Property (Digital Assets etc) Bill. A financial remedy release note enabling respondent solicitors to lodge final consent orders directly on the HMCTS portal to finalise contested proceedings is also set out, together with details of a new Precedent client guide on the variation of financial remedy orders.
To continue reading this news article, as well as thousands of others like it, sign in with UUÂãÁÄÖ±²¥ or register for a free trial
EXISTING USER? SIGN IN CONTINUE READING GET A QUOTE
**Trials are provided to all UUÂãÁÄÖ±²¥ content, excluding Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance, subscription packages are tailored to your specific needs. To discuss trialling these UUÂãÁÄÖ±²¥ services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK, Ireland and selected UK overseas territories and Caribbean countries. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.
* denotes a required field
This week's edition of Family weekly highlights includes an analysis of the Court of Appeal decision on the differences in the approach taken by courts in different regions when deciding whether a care order, supervision order or no order should be made when public law care proceedings end with a
Financial clean break orders in family proceedingsDuty of the court to consider a clean breakAlthough there is no presumption in favour of there being a financial clean break between parties on divorce, the court is under a duty to consider whether it would be appropriate to exercise its powers so
Brussels I (recast)—domicile (Arts 4 and 63) [Archived]ARCHIVED: This Practice Note has been archived and is not maintained.This Practice Note considers the general rule set out in Article 4 of Regulation (EU) 1215/2012, Brussels I (recast) when determining the relevance of a defendant’s domicile to
Contributory negligence in personal injury claimsContributory negligence is a partial defence which can lead to a discount in damages.Other defences may also be relevant. See Practice Notes: Did the claimant consent to the risk of injury? and Was the claimant involved in an illegal activity?If a
0330 161 1234