UUÂãÁÄÖ±²¥

Harassment

Produced by Tolley in association with
Employment Tax
Guidance

Harassment

Produced by Tolley in association with
Employment Tax
Guidance
imgtext

Harassment is unlawful under the Equality Act 2010 where it:

  1. •

    relates to a relevant protected characteristic

  2. •

    constitutes sexual harassment

  3. •

    constitutes less favourable treatment as a result of a victim's acceptance or rejection of:

    1. â—¦

      sexual harassment

    2. â—¦

      harassment related to the protected characteristic of gender reassignment or sex

EqA 2010, s 26

Harassment related to a protected characteristic

Harassment is conduct which is:

  1. •

    unwanted

  2. •

    related to a relevant protected characteristic

Where that unwanted conduct has the purpose or effect of:

  1. •

    violating the victim's dignity

  2. •

    creating an environment that is intimidating, hostile, degrading, humiliating or offensive to the victim

EqA 2010, s 26(1)

See Example 1, Example 2 and Example 3.

Protected characteristics of third parties ― associative discrimination

As the unwanted conduct need only be 'related to' the relevant protected characteristic, it is clear that the victim of the harassment does not have to possess that characteristic.

Rather, the relevant protected characteristic might belong to some relevant third party.

Discrimination

Continue reading
To read the full Guidance note, register for a free trial of Tolley+â„¢
Emma Bartlett
Emma Bartlett

Partner at Charles Russell Speechlys LLP


Emma advises on all aspects of employment law including unlawful discrimination, whistleblowing, equal pay, unfair dismissal, breach of contract, restrictive covenants, protecting confidential information, boardroom disputes and claims under TUPE. She has experience in obtaining and executing interim injunctions for breach of confidentiality and/or restrictive covenant provisions. She also leads diversity issues for Charles Russell Speechlys employment team.With a strong record in negotiating and resolving complex employment disputes, Emma is considered a skilled deal broker. She is a specialist in contentious discrimination matters and has significant experience in handling high value contentious claims for employers and senior individuals. Emma acts for employers, employees and trade unions. Her client base is broad, both in terms of the range of work and the sectors in which they operate. Amongst these clients are a number of growing, dynamic businesses (including UK start-ups), as well as long established financial institutions, and senior executives.Emma speaks regularly on diversity issues, edits the diversity sections of Lawtel Employment Precedents and Company Policy Documents and certain diversity sections of Tolley Guidance Employment Tax online, and regularly contributes to article in HR and legal publications as well as comments in the national press on diversity issues.ExperienceSuccessfully defended a tribunal claim of race and religious discrimination against a household name private members club. Added complications arose as the matter was reported in the press before judgment was given. An appeal to the Employment Appeals Tribunal was rejected. Advised and represented a large London retailer in relation to a multi-discrimination employment tribunal complaint (direct, indirect, victimisation and harassment based on race and religion). The claim was complicated by the variety of allegations and the worker's status; there were three preliminary hearings before a full merits hearing was listed. There were also four named Respondents to the claim. Successfully settled the action for a nominal sum, with agreement that all allegations were retracted and not repeated despite the action continuing against the other Respondents. Advised and negotiated service agreements for the senior management team of the seller on a multimillion pound share sale of a UK business. A major legal victory for a pilot employed by a household name airline, in a landmark case against the airline for indirect age discrimination. The decision has industry-wide ramifications for airlines and other organisations which provide a combination of long-term permanent health insurance or similar income protection payments via third party and self-insurance.

Powered by
  • 22 Oct 2024 09:12

Popular Articles

SEIS and EIS ― overview

SEIS and EIS ― overviewThe seed enterprise investment scheme (SEIS) and enterprise investment scheme (EIS) are very similar schemes which offer substantial tax incentives to investors in companies which qualify. The tax incentives for SEIS and EIS investments are intended to encourage investment in

14 Jul 2020 13:31 | Produced by Tolley Read more Read more

Tax on UK resident beneficiaries of non-resident trusts ― overview

Tax on UK resident beneficiaries of non-resident trusts ― overviewIntroductionUK resident beneficiaries of non-resident trusts are subject to UK tax on payments or benefits received from the trust. They are liable for income tax on income distributions from the trust and they may also be liable to

14 Jul 2020 13:47 | Produced by Tolley Read more Read more

Fuel-related payments / mileage payments

Fuel-related payments / mileage paymentsIntroductionMost employers will make payments to employees in relation to business travel. Among the most common payments in relation to business travel are fuel and mileage payments. If an employer does not reimburse these amounts, then the employee will be

14 Jul 2020 11:46 | Produced by Tolley in association with Philip Rutherford Read more Read more