UUÂãÁÄÖ±²¥

Harassment

Produced by Tolley in association with
Employment Tax
Guidance

Harassment

Produced by Tolley in association with
Employment Tax
Guidance
imgtext

Harassment is unlawful under the Equality Act 2010 where it:

  1. •

    relates to a relevant protected characteristic

  2. •

    constitutes sexual harassment

  3. •

    constitutes less favourable treatment as a result of a victim's acceptance or rejection of:

    1. â—¦

      sexual harassment

    2. â—¦

      harassment related to the protected characteristic of gender reassignment or sex

EqA 2010, s 26

Harassment related to a protected characteristic

Harassment is conduct which is:

  1. •

    unwanted

  2. •

    related to a relevant protected characteristic

Where that unwanted conduct has the purpose or effect of:

  1. •

    violating the victim's dignity

  2. •

    creating an environment that is intimidating, hostile, degrading, humiliating or offensive to the victim

EqA 2010, s 26(1)

See Example 1, Example 2 and Example 3.

Protected characteristics of third parties ― associative discrimination

As the unwanted conduct need only be 'related to' the relevant protected characteristic, it is clear that the victim of the harassment does not have to possess that characteristic.

Rather, the relevant protected characteristic might belong to some relevant third party.

Discrimination

Access this article and thousands of others like it
free for 7 days with a trial of Tolley+™ Guidance.

Emma Bartlett
Emma Bartlett

Partner at Charles Russell Speechlys LLP


Emma advises on all aspects of employment law including unlawful discrimination, whistleblowing, equal pay, unfair dismissal, breach of contract, restrictive covenants, protecting confidential information, boardroom disputes and claims under TUPE. She has experience in obtaining and executing interim injunctions for breach of confidentiality and/or restrictive covenant provisions. She also leads diversity issues for Charles Russell Speechlys employment team.   With a strong record in negotiating and resolving complex employment disputes, Emma is considered a skilled deal broker. She is a specialist in contentious discrimination matters and has significant experience in handling high value contentious claims for employers and senior individuals. Emma acts for employers, employees and trade unions. Her client base is broad, both in terms of the range of work and the sectors in which they operate. Amongst these clients are a number of growing, dynamic businesses (including UK start-ups), as well as long established financial institutions, and senior executives.   Emma speaks regularly on diversity issues, edits the diversity sections of Lawtel Employment Precedents and Company Policy Documents and certain diversity sections of Tolley Guidance Employment Tax online, and regularly contributes to article in HR and legal publications as well as comments in the national press on diversity issues.   Experience Successfully defended a tribunal claim of race and religious discrimination against a household name private members club. Added complications arose as the matter was reported in the press before judgment was given. An appeal to the Employment Appeals Tribunal was rejected. Advised and represented a large London retailer in relation to a multi-discrimination employment tribunal complaint (direct, indirect, victimisation and harassment based on race and religion). The claim was complicated by the variety of allegations and the worker's status; there were three preliminary hearings before a full merits hearing was listed. There were also four named Respondents to the claim. Successfully settled the action for a nominal sum, with agreement that all allegations were retracted and not repeated despite the action continuing against the other Respondents. Advised and negotiated service agreements for the senior management team of the seller on a multimillion pound share sale of a UK business. A major legal victory for a pilot employed by a household name airline, in a landmark case against the airline for indirect age discrimination. The decision has industry-wide ramifications for airlines and other organisations which provide a combination of long-term permanent health insurance or similar income protection payments via third party and self-insurance.

Powered by
  • 22 Oct 2024 09:12

Popular Articles

Incentives, awards and prizes

Incentives, awards and prizesIntroduction ― incentives, awards and prizesEmployers may use a variety of methods to reward and encourage employees in their work. These are commonly known as incentives, awards or prizes. For the purposes of this note, the term ‘award’ will be used to cover all

14 Jul 2020 11:57 | Produced by Tolley Read more Read more

Payment of the remittance basis charge

Payment of the remittance basis chargeRemittance basis chargeThe remittance basis charge is an annual charge payable by ‘long-term’ UK residents for the privilege of claiming the remittance basis.Taxpayers who wish to utilise the remittance basis (but do not qualify for it automatically) must pay

14 Jul 2020 12:52 | Produced by Tolley Read more Read more

Exemption ― insurance ― overview

Exemption ― insurance ― overviewThis guidance note provides an overview of the VAT treatment of insurance products and should be read in conjunction with the Insurance ― specific transactions and Exemption ― insurance ― brokers and agents guidance notes.Is insurance exempt from VAT?Supplies of

Read more Read more