UUÂãÁÄÖ±²¥

Prohibited conduct ― indirect discrimination

Produced by Tolley in association with
Employment Tax
Guidance

Prohibited conduct ― indirect discrimination

Produced by Tolley in association with
Employment Tax
Guidance
imgtext

Indirect discrimination occurs where the employer treats all workers the same, but where some aspect of that uniform treatment affects one group of workers adversely when compared with another.

In order to determine whether indirect discrimination has taken place in the workplace under the EqA 2010, s 19, an employer should ask the following questions:

  1. •

    does the worker possess any one of the protected characteristics (other than pregnancy and maternity)? (see the Protected characteristics guidance note)

  2. •

    has an identifiable provision, criterion or practice (PCP) been applied to the worker?

  3. •

    has the same PCP been applied to other workers who do not possess the same protected characteristic?

  4. •

    does the PCP put, or would it put, a worker with the protected characteristic at a particular disadvantage when compared with workers who do not possess it?

  5. •

    does the PCP put, or would it put, the individual worker at that disadvantage?

  6. •

    can it be shown that the PCP is 'a proportionate means of achieving a legitimate aim'?

PCPs

Access this article and thousands of others like it
free for 7 days with a trial of Tolley+™ Guidance.

Emma Bartlett
Emma Bartlett

Partner at Charles Russell Speechlys LLP


Emma advises on all aspects of employment law including unlawful discrimination, whistleblowing, equal pay, unfair dismissal, breach of contract, restrictive covenants, protecting confidential information, boardroom disputes and claims under TUPE. She has experience in obtaining and executing interim injunctions for breach of confidentiality and/or restrictive covenant provisions. She also leads diversity issues for Charles Russell Speechlys employment team.   With a strong record in negotiating and resolving complex employment disputes, Emma is considered a skilled deal broker. She is a specialist in contentious discrimination matters and has significant experience in handling high value contentious claims for employers and senior individuals. Emma acts for employers, employees and trade unions. Her client base is broad, both in terms of the range of work and the sectors in which they operate. Amongst these clients are a number of growing, dynamic businesses (including UK start-ups), as well as long established financial institutions, and senior executives.   Emma speaks regularly on diversity issues, edits the diversity sections of Lawtel Employment Precedents and Company Policy Documents and certain diversity sections of Tolley Guidance Employment Tax online, and regularly contributes to article in HR and legal publications as well as comments in the national press on diversity issues.   Experience Successfully defended a tribunal claim of race and religious discrimination against a household name private members club. Added complications arose as the matter was reported in the press before judgment was given. An appeal to the Employment Appeals Tribunal was rejected. Advised and represented a large London retailer in relation to a multi-discrimination employment tribunal complaint (direct, indirect, victimisation and harassment based on race and religion). The claim was complicated by the variety of allegations and the worker's status; there were three preliminary hearings before a full merits hearing was listed. There were also four named Respondents to the claim. Successfully settled the action for a nominal sum, with agreement that all allegations were retracted and not repeated despite the action continuing against the other Respondents. Advised and negotiated service agreements for the senior management team of the seller on a multimillion pound share sale of a UK business. A major legal victory for a pilot employed by a household name airline, in a landmark case against the airline for indirect age discrimination. The decision has industry-wide ramifications for airlines and other organisations which provide a combination of long-term permanent health insurance or similar income protection payments via third party and self-insurance.

Powered by
  • 18 Apr 2023 09:30

Popular Articles

Gifts out of surplus income

Gifts out of surplus incomeA valuable exemption from inheritance tax (IHT) applies to gifts out of surplus income. This exemption applies only to lifetime gifts and is therefore a key part of lifetime planning. The exemption applies to both outright gifts and gifts into trust. Gifts which meet the

14 Jul 2020 11:48 | Produced by Tolley in association with Emma Haley at Boodle Hatfield LLP Read more Read more

Research and development expenditure credit (RDEC)

Research and development expenditure credit (RDEC)This guidance note provides information on how research and development expenditure credits (RDEC) are calculated and utilised. The Qualifying expenditure for R&D tax relief guidance note provides information on what expenditure qualifies for

14 Jul 2020 13:24 | Produced by Tolley in association with Will Sweeney Read more Read more

Holding companies ― VAT status of activities

Holding companies ― VAT status of activitiesThis guidance note examines how to determine the VAT status of a holding company’s activities. In particular, it looks at:•when a holding company is or is not in business•if a holding company is in business, whether its activities are exempt or taxableThe

14 Jul 2020 17:13 | Produced by Tolley Read more Read more